Im not sure why a simple opinion has become some sort of battleground for legitimacy. What, because a boxer says Boxer A beats Boxer B that it must be so? No need to actually make the fight, then? Lots of fighters have come out on both sides of the debate. Just like us.
Tito is my all-time #1 fighter, but I will respectfully disagree on this one. We all are entitled our own opinions though.
The question is, what year is this quote from? I wonder what he would say after the lat fight with Marquez. In any case, Tito was a great pro, so I respect his take on the fight.
Similar to how a few weeks ago, Pacquiao will obliterate Marquez, KO 4? It's all opinion. Elite top fighters have very little room for theoretical analysis. It all comes down what will actually happen inside the ring when they actually face. I am not discounting analysis of styles and skills and capabilities. I'm just saying at the level of Mayweather and Pacquiao it will always be open for debate, but easily settled at the ring. That is why this fight needs to ****ing happen for the good of boxing.
Everybody's opinions don't mean sh*t cause it doesn't affect what happens in the ring. The only ones who can answer it is pac and may when they meet in the ring. Even if tito says pac beats may or leonard says may beat pac, it won't mean sh*t. It doesn't answer what really happens in the ring. Let the experts say anything they want. Most of the experts said pac KO's jmm easy, then what happened. Are the experts correct then? :nono
Well Hopkins who beat Tito says Mayweather wins the match-up. Should we assume he knows more about boxing than Tito. Your point is a waist. Find another way to hate on Floyd.