Tito Trinidad: "Pacquiao Definitely Beats Floyd"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by AxlRose, Nov 26, 2011.


  1. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    And Hopkins said Mayweather would win, and remember Hopkins KO 12 Trinidad so Hopkins>Trinidad.
     
  2. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    ESB - if it doesnt fit your agenda, its not credible!!!!
     
  3. Phat_Ass_Dude

    Phat_Ass_Dude Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,340
    0
    Jun 29, 2011
    Yeah, that's about right.
     
  4. demigawd

    demigawd Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,046
    154
    May 1, 2006
    Im not sure why a simple opinion has become some sort of battleground for legitimacy. What, because a boxer says Boxer A beats Boxer B that it must be so? No need to actually make the fight, then?

    Lots of fighters have come out on both sides of the debate. Just like us.
     
  5. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    86
    Sep 3, 2007
    `Pacquiao definitely beats Floyd` in the same manner that `Trinidad definitely beats Hopkins`
     
  6. carras

    carras Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,596
    0
    Jul 22, 2004

    yup, crazy ****.
     
  7. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    Nope....Floyd is Hopkins

    Pac is Jermaine Taylor.... :hi:
     
  8. haglerdude

    haglerdude Active Member Full Member

    768
    4
    Apr 25, 2008
    maybe tito is right but thats just his opinion. we all have one.
     
  9. haglerdude

    haglerdude Active Member Full Member

    768
    4
    Apr 25, 2008
    well said.
     
  10. ElTrigueno

    ElTrigueno Guest

    Tito is my all-time #1 fighter, but I will respectfully disagree on this one. We all are entitled our own opinions though.
     
  11. mancat

    mancat Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,511
    1
    Jun 20, 2007
    The question is, what year is this quote from? I wonder what he would say after the lat fight with Marquez.

    In any case, Tito was a great pro, so I respect his take on the fight.
     
  12. Jetmax

    Jetmax Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,729
    0
    Jan 4, 2010
    Similar to how a few weeks ago, Pacquiao will obliterate Marquez, KO 4?

    It's all opinion. Elite top fighters have very little room for theoretical analysis. It all comes down what will actually happen inside the ring when they actually face. I am not discounting analysis of styles and skills and capabilities. I'm just saying at the level of Mayweather and Pacquiao it will always be open for debate, but easily settled at the ring. That is why this fight needs to ****ing happen for the good of boxing.
     
  13. jan_fan

    jan_fan Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,990
    0
    Sep 28, 2011
    Everybody's opinions don't mean sh*t cause it doesn't affect what happens in the ring.
    The only ones who can answer it is pac and may when they meet in the ring.
    Even if tito says pac beats may or leonard says may beat pac, it won't mean sh*t.
    It doesn't answer what really happens in the ring. Let the experts say anything they want.
    Most of the experts said pac KO's jmm easy, then what happened. Are the experts correct then? :nono
     
  14. Jai C

    Jai C Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,746
    0
    Apr 13, 2009
    Well Hopkins who beat Tito says Mayweather wins the match-up. Should we assume he knows more about boxing than Tito. Your point is a waist. Find another way to hate on Floyd.
     
  15. Duck Dodgers

    Duck Dodgers Kimbo #1 P4P Full Member

    7,057
    5
    Sep 16, 2010
    When has Tito ever been a good analyst?