Tito vs Cotto p4p?

Cotto isn't even better technically.

Anybody that thinks that never saw the 90's Trinidad, or doesn't actually KNOW what technical skills are.

Tito had a very underrated jab, had a better arsenal of punches than one armed Cotto, and did a better job of blocking/parrying shots than Cotto does. Those are all part of TECHNICAL SKILLS.

So no, Cotto has NOTHING over Tito.

Trinidad was better in every way possible.

 

Miguel Cotto has always been a great boxer and class guy, with a great family. He is no Trinidad, though. Never has been, never will be.

 

I'm glad there is 1 guy on ESB willing to defend the truth of Felix Trinidad. :good

 

did i say it was close h2h? no i did not so learn how to spell and read before you call other people ******ed

 

tito wouldve never lost to a midget by KO

:hat

 

I like both guys and followed each of their careers, rough night for both of them, for me a 140lb Cotto is P4P better than any version of Tito, but head to head at 147 or 154 Tito would knock lumps out of him.

 

Right on. IMO Tito would have stopped Cotto within 5-6 rounds. I watched most of Tito's fights back then as well.

 

you forgot david reid, fred pendleton

 

it was just a quick run through, not detailed....i haven't seen the p pendleton fight, is it worth watching?

 

Cotto at 147 was better than Cotto at 140, so that makes ZERO sense.

 

i'll be honest right now i can't remember much of it until i watch then it'll probably come back to mind