Margarito ? That was one of the most one-sided beatdowns in the history of the sport. You could have looked for a better example. As to the question, Pac utterly destroys Tito at 147. Way too fast and Tito's chin way to vulnerable.
Only fools considered his loss to Hopkins an upset. The ****ing thing was at MW, and Tito has no resume at MW. Roy Jones ? :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
If Margarito can land on Pacquiao, Tito can drop bombs on him. The basis of Manny winning seems to be that Tito would land 0 punches in the entire fight.
Honestly, Trinidad has the better jab of the two. Trinidad had a good jab, if you watch his career fights you will see he did have boxing skills.
missmatch of epic proportions. tito could take hopkins punches for 11 rounds and de la hoyas but he would get kod by pac in the mid rounds. . . . . lay of the drugs
I don't think Manny can win due to the size difference but I see all haters quoting the same **** before the PAC vs Hoya fight . Right after the fight most disappeared...and the one that stayed down played PAC by saying He only won cause Hoya was drained. Before the fight, Hoya by murder. After the fight, Hoya was drained and a dead man walking .
The reason why Hopkins easily timed him is because Tito's money shots require him to plant his feet firmly on the ground before punching. This takes him a lot of precious time, and if he's gon fight a fighter with ATG speed and coordination, he's ****ed. In other words, if Tito launched his left hook Monday, it would reach Pac Friday. That's how slow it would be for Pac who has seen speed from the likes of a Morales and MAB yet beat them in brutal fashion. Pac by brutal KO.