TMT Promotions...VADA or USADA or no extra testing??

Where is the 'testing but have no agenda who with' option?

 

Actually, Marquez said that Floyd must have weighed 160.

 

**** what that ****-drinker actually said..

Use your eyes...

Floyd did not look heavier than usual.....:think...certainly not 160.

 

Why did Pac refuse VADA testing for the Bradley fight????

 

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=13541998&postcount=103

atsch

 

If anyone wants to get back on track, EITHER agency is fine. However, there has to be stipulations, such as involving the st6ate commission or the ABC. We can't have promoters engaging in confidential agreements with the testers. there has to be transparency in this. As for costs, some as "What does it matter?" Well it obviously matters since not everyone is doing it, and it IS costly.

For something like this, either agency would hopefully drop their price since there would be a constant stream of revenue. Think of it like Costco selling cheaper in bulk. Either of the agencies involved could drum up a 'group discount' rate for testing, because lets be honest. Boxing is not dying.

But back to the matter at hand, we'll see if in fact TMT does use testing for ALL their fights. Only then, will they have succeeded in their so-called goal of cleaning.

 

floyd will stay with usada 'cause it benefits him :hey

 

Epic...

 

HAHAHA!!!! well that sums it up. Don't even think I'm gonna bother with any of these threads anymore now that we have this brilliant pic it will be a simple image insert for every one of these ******* threads.

 

:yep:yep:yep