To all those who believe p4p = h2h/weight, please give me your opinions...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Dec 8, 2008.


  1. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    its kinda vague if you ask me. It equals the "fantasy match-ups" usually done in the forums... If you're gonna say that "The P4P" concept is stupid might as well stop pitting current fighters against last era's, cause its as stupid.
     
  2. stevebhoy87

    stevebhoy87 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,304
    5
    Dec 7, 2007

    I think you are right in regards to a direct H2H match up in that aspect, it is impossible to do in any meaningful way, we just cannot know the affect of the physics on the boxer. if they where 50 pounds heavier or 10 inches smaller

    However what i think most people mean isn't really H2H as such but skill sets. Eg of course we can never know if pac was 168 he could beat calzaghe but we can make assumptions as to who is the more complete and talented boxer in there own weight divisions and take this into account in P4P rakings