It is hypocrisy to say that Dirrell lost but Haye won. The people who criticised Dirrell saying, "he didn't do enough to take the title from the champion", "you can't win a title fighting off the back foot and running all night", "you can't win rounds by doing nothing for 2 mins of the rounds and then landing a few punches in the last few seconds", cannot deny that Haye did the same thing! The same people justified Froch winning by saying, "Froch was the one trying to make the fight" and "Froch was the aggressor and so deserved the decision" even though it was ineffective aggression, but this is exactly what Valuev did!! You cannot have it both ways. You can't keep changing how you score a fight to suit your agenda and this is why the thread starter pointed out the contradiction from a lot of Haye & Froch fans.
Which would be negated by the point deductions for Dirrell dipping below his opponents waistband :deal
This is getting pretty old ....Dirrell did not outpunch Froch, end of story. You may think he did, you might believe that you saw it with your own eyes, but the fight stats are contrary to that opinion.
Yes he did!!! I can't believe some of you are still denying that The vast majority of those who watched the fight agree that Dirrell won but there's always a few of you atsch Where are these fight stats you speak of?
There were no official stats released for this fight and if they are ever released they will not even slightly resemble those completely fabricated stats on Boxrec. Those data boxing stats are a joke, who even comes up with that **** :rofl
Which would in turn be negated by the fact Froch threw Dirrell to the ground in an MMA takedown. Froch was a dirty ****er all night and only one guy got a point... Yet people are still giving rounds to Froch just because Dirrell did this and that which is completely unrelated to scoring a fight
Haye ran, he is fake. Vitali wants to knock Haye out ASAP, but Haye is still running form he and Vlad, which is a fact.
I suspect that if they had supported your position you would have held them up in a flash....obviously the wrong type of snow
He didn't throw Dirrell to the canvas in an "MMA takedown", don't exagerate...Cotto did against Clottey and no ****er bats an eyelid...double standards perhaps. End of the day there is only one man with the belt, and it isn't Andre "marathon man" Dirrell.....some of the schoolgirls on here squeal as though the fight was daylight robbery, it wasn't, not even close to being so.