Yup. I saw an advert last night that said it was for the world middleweight title & if you look at the sky listing the description also says it's for the title.
Setanta have the better fights but Sky's coverage is far more professional. Have you noticed how in general Setanta just looks like a cheap version of Sky? Look at their news channel. It's bascially the same as Sky's with a few changes. The things they have changed are ****.
Setanta are great because they actually have the fights but I wish to god they had the same standard of production as sky. Their commentators are **** too. I remember the Calzaghe/Kessler fight with Ritchie Woodhall constantly saying CalZAKI. It did my head in. Joe should've given him a slap.
I think Woodhall is the one good thing about Setantas coverage. I don't mind them using the American commentary teams, I just wish they'd use the decent ones...
Setanta sure have nicked a lot of skys reporters though,they have a good dozen or so now,im staying up for this **** then,im a virgin customer,so its free i think(i'll pay if i have to though)