To many f**cking belts these days

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jimmy1991, Oct 15, 2007.


Page 3 of 3
  1. jsimps

    jsimps Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,172
    1
    Aug 6, 2007
    I guess not..
     
    jsimps, Oct 15, 2007
    jsimps, Oct 15, 2007
    #31
  2. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,144
    Oct 22, 2006
    The ultimate psuedo title would be the lineal title.;)
     
    TBooze, Oct 15, 2007
    TBooze, Oct 15, 2007
    #32
  3. jimmy1991

    jimmy1991 Active Member Full Member

    1,406
    0
    Oct 10, 2007
    see this is why i posted this, a youth title thats dum why dont the make a over 40 title to
     
    jimmy1991, Oct 15, 2007
    jimmy1991, Oct 15, 2007
    #33
  4. jimmy1991

    jimmy1991 Active Member Full Member

    1,406
    0
    Oct 10, 2007
    yer thats a good point
     
    jimmy1991, Oct 15, 2007
    jimmy1991, Oct 15, 2007
    #34
  5. jimmy1991

    jimmy1991 Active Member Full Member

    1,406
    0
    Oct 10, 2007
    yer couldnt name one ufc fighter, but what iam saying is it would b eazyer 4 people to notice the world champ if there was one , or to b able to call your self the world champ if u where the only one 4 that weight class.
     
    jimmy1991, Oct 15, 2007
    jimmy1991, Oct 15, 2007
    #35
  6. stuistylee

    stuistylee j.c.chavez superstar Full Member

    1,734
    0
    May 22, 2007
    some of the heavyweights these days make me wonder if we need mothershipweight class...thats not a compliment
     
    stuistylee, Oct 15, 2007
    stuistylee, Oct 15, 2007
    #36
  7. joshrulesinc

    joshrulesinc New Member Full Member

    4
    0
    Oct 18, 2007
    So whats the most credible belt out there, i usually go off the ring title they seem the most neutral when ranking.
     
    joshrulesinc, Oct 18, 2007
    joshrulesinc, Oct 18, 2007
    #37
  8. Darien

    Darien Active Member Full Member

    820
    0
    Dec 28, 2004
    Look at those rankings again. Do you see any WBA, WBO or IBF champs on the WBC rankings? Or WBC, WBA or IBF beltholders on the WBO rankings? No you don't. It's because the big 4 has an agreement to recognize eachother's titleholders as champions so they don't rank them. The IBO is not a major title and is not recognized by the top 4. They have a computerized ranking system (a much better one than the boxrec crap) and they rank the top 100 fighters in each division (only the top 50 below 118lbs) regardless of what strap they wear.
     
    Darien, Oct 18, 2007
    Darien, Oct 18, 2007
    #38
Page 3 of 3