To me, GGG reminds of a poor mans Trinidad, could KO most but losses to best

GGG is too big for Tito. Tito cannot beat him. Come on.

 

Tito was exciting and entertaining fighter but skillwise he is at least two times below Golovkin. Even Hopkins said it. Person who posted this delusional thread must stop what ever he is using.

 

tito was severly overrated, looked ordinary in a lot of fights but was saved by the power ins his left hook.

 

Size, strength, power and more importantly technique.

Tito was as 1 dimensional as an elite fighter has ever been, throw into the fray he competed in the 160 division when it was as equally poor, if not worse than it is now.

 

A poor man's tito? First off, GGG is a MUCH better boxer than tito. The only thing tito had was amazing pressure and that left hook. He had a shaky chin and once he'd met up with a savy boxer, he lost. (hops, oscar, jones) Mind you those are all elite types that GGG hasnt' been tested against. But then again, there's nobody today as good as those guys were either. That said, GGG would be competitive in that 90s era and potentially would be champion. At 160 vs Tito, its hard to bet against tito but GGG hits harder but isnt as fast, and think he has a better chin too and would probably box tito to a UD putting tito on the canvas a couple times. Then again, the hops dismantled Tito, I can see GGG doing that also. Tito's speed advantage wouldn't mean much, alot of GGGs opponents are faster than him.