To put the "exposed" comments into perspective.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Addie, Nov 23, 2008.


  1. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    I should be in bed by now, but having just come across that turd of a thread about "**** boxers being exposed", I began thinking.

    Marco Antonio Barrera was once 43-0, with his best win coming against a war torn Kennedy Mckinney in one of the best fights of the last 20 years. The fight itself was savage and extremely competitive. Barrera took a lot of right hands, and was hurt a couple of times before stopping Mckinney in the 11th round.

    Perhaps in typical knee-jerk fashion, Barrera would have been first congratulated on an epic fight, and then slated for being to easy to hit on the general forum. They would have said:

    "Against a fighter like Naseem Hamed, Marco wouldn't have been able to take that many right hands and would get exposed and KTFO"

    These predictions would begin to mass further once Barrera took on the experianced Junior jones, only to be knocked out. A rematch would ensue, but Barrera was noticably weary of the right hand, and inevitably lost a lopsided decision.

    Perhaps in typical knee-jerk fashion, Barrera would have been once again slated on the general forum. This time, they say:

    "Barrera is a glass-jawed joke. He padded his record, and the first time he steps up in class he goes life and death with a shop worn Mckinney, and then gets KTFO by Jones. He'll be a gatekeeper at best"

    Of course, this would all be academic once Barrera was to establish himself as not only an elite level fighter, but one of the greatest Mexican fighters of all time.

    A razor thin loss to Erik Morales, which he would avenge twice after dominating the Prince, really defied all of the doubters.

    Much like Darchinyan, who was once slated for losing to Donaire, and then reinvigorated with a knockout victory over the talented Mijares, Barrera would now be relevant once again.

    Was Kelly Pavlik really exposed at the hands of Hopkins, or was he just in the ring with an established all-time great? I suppose we'll let history decide.
     
  2. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Crazyboy876, You Have Officially Been Exposed & Owned!

    SELFKILL OWNS YOU BRO!
     
  3. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Fighters rarely get exposed, but their fans do. ;)
     
  4. ninebar

    ninebar Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,032
    0
    May 24, 2008
  5. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Fighters lose fights, even the greatest of fighters.
     
  6. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Which is a shame because the emphasis on being unbeaten in the last decade has probably stopped hundreds of great matchups happening.
     
  7. ninebar

    ninebar Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,032
    0
    May 24, 2008
    alot of O' have gone in the past year
     
  8. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    This thread has me laughing cause the main guy he's talking about is so embarrassed, he wont even stand up for himself. This is the true definition of a ******ed poster being exposed!
     
  9. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    The guy who initiated that awful thread about "**** boxers being exposed" was certainly the reason for my thread, but he isn't the only one guilty of such talk.

    Fighters weaknesses can be exposed, as Barrera's was against Junior Jones. He was to open for the right hand, but he made adjustments which made it possible for him to go 12 rounds with Erik Morales, and beat world class operators, such as Naz and Morales.

    Because a weakness is "exposed" does not mean they are "**** boxers".
     
  10. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Couldn't have said it better than that. Almost every fighter has a weakness, its just that a few are lucky to never have that weakness exposed.
     
  11. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    70,962
    27,537
    Jul 26, 2004
    wow... great post, you said what ive wanted to say yet did it better then i could. Nicely done.
     
  12. shelterr

    shelterr Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,886
    0
    Sep 7, 2006
    All I'm saying is Joe Fraizier exposed Ali in their first fight...that Cooper knockdown was no fluke!
     
  13. pmfan

    pmfan Active Member Full Member

    1,408
    2
    May 11, 2008
    Nonesense. Ali fought awesomely in that first fight. And Joe fought fantastically in the Thrilla in Manilla. When two great fighters fight, on one night boxer A's strengths will prevail. But on another night, Boxer's B's strenths might prevail.

    That's not to say that one of Ali's relative weaknesses wasn't his defense to a great left hook. But that fact doesn't mean he was "exposed" in that fight.

    And the second and third fights with Frazier, the very same fighter who was allegedly exposed, managed to stay away from the left hook.

    Ali punished Joe severely in their first fight, even in a losing effort, just as Frazier severely punished Ali in his losing effort in Manilla.
     
  14. Butch Coolidge

    Butch Coolidge Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,305
    2,625
    Jul 20, 2004
    I try not to judge a fighter based on the results of one fight, be it a good result or a bad result.
     
  15. shelterr

    shelterr Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,886
    0
    Sep 7, 2006
    Dude..I was REALLY joking!