Jones is in top 10. He have more natural skills than ALI and everyone likes to give ALI as number 1 or 2 greatest.
You have no credibility on this subject for one you don't rank RJJ as a top 100 ATG and two you have Tito rated higher than RJJ.:-(
You RJJ fans are the worht kind.......His resume just don;t hold water...end of story...as I mentioned the names taht are not on his resume, contemporaries on the same weight classes he choose to ignore, I for one would ahve love to see RRJ tangle with Sumbu Kalambay, the cat hit like a truck and would have given RJJ a run for his money of KTFO in similar fashion Glencofe did....similar fighters...
First of all I don't have BHop top 100 either, if you would like to see my top 100 list then go to the thread by the same name...and you will see that neither PBF nor RJJ nor BHop are Top 100..... Basically you are saying, we don;t care of the period of the fight nor the cirstustances surrounding the fight, you just base it on the name of the fighter on the resume..."Hell I recognied his name...therefore he was good ,and on his prime when he fought RJJ..." come on Dude...everything has to be analysed and taking thing for their face value ...ain;t my style...I like to look at the date and see what the data is telling me ...the facts......
The fact that you believe Johnson and Tarver to be the best competition in Roys career is absurd. Prime Roy would have crapped on Johnson, this part of your post is complete rubbish.
Yet another reason why you have no credibility here. Hopkins and RJJ aren't top 100 but a one-dimensional fighter like Tito who lost everytime he stepped up is un****ingbelievable.atsch :-( I guess you'll have new venom come January when RJJ puts a demolition job on Tito. :hi:
The only fight on the resume of Roy;s that absulutely take my hat off to him was the Julio Cesar Gonzalez fight...he totally outclassed a very good fighter...wikth a good punch
LOL...did that go over your head? If Woods can go 1-1-1 with Johnson, and you consider Johnson high level competition, then how can you say Woods is overrated and not give Jones credit for beating him? If you say Tarver is high level competition, then how can you call Harding bad comp when he beat Tarver? Your analysis is full of holes like this.
When did I said that Tito is top 100, I say you can make a case......for it...regardless of your bias opinions...it is not only me that don;t have RJJ top 100.....Ok...a number of top Boxing writers including Bert Sugar don't have RJJ top 100 ....Ok...so Bert Sugar as no credibility either.....**** fool.....
You know the garbage man you are always bitching about that Jones fought? The one you ridicule him for? That's GONZALEZ? So you give him credit for fighting Gonzalez, but bash him for the garbage man? You don't even know they are the same guy.:deal
ONLY Bert Sugar doesn't have him in his top 100....and I haven't seen proof of that either. Bring us another list that shows all these writers (4th time I have asked you for this, you never produce it).