To Those Complaining About Johnson as Vitali's Opponent!

Yes I do the other fighters you listed are all buzy, other peoples mandatorys, recently lost and have had no return bouts. Other young fighters are just as obscure. Johnson is the best un tied up fighter he is perfectly fine or such a short notice bout. I expect his next fight to be good. What do you expect the division is not that deep anybody can run off a bunch of names.

 

Then that is sad for the future of boxing, that you can get a world tite fight without fighting a meaningfull opponent. It shows the way to get a shot is to be corrupt and fradulent and avoid making good fights.
And that is why the sport stinks, people think it is ok and are CONNED BY THE 'O'.

 

Then why dont you fight Vitali, you make it sound so easy to get a heavyweight shot. Johnson is no nobody he has over 20 wins no losses and respectable wins from a young up and comer like Hawkins, Vargas, Seldon, Smith all very nice wins for anybodys resume. He is consistent no bad performances. He gets better every time. Sure he stands no chance but who left does. I think your just extremely biased. Vitali's 3rd defense this year at 38 against another undefeated prospect. What more do you want. He is an active champ Joe Loui's Bums a the month were less deserving at that was when there was 1 belt. This guy is better than some of those guys in a 4 title system. Vitlai is only using this as a tune up for the Maskaev-Austin winner or a unification. I think people are overly critical

 

look who patterson fought pete rademacher,roy harris (a cowboy),brian london(bridges falling down) in 3 years .

 

Finally a logical point and dead on. Somebody who knows boxing.

 

The absolute one thing I am not is biased and I am not being critical of Vitali. My arguement is allowing the challenger. I listed many names, there are many Europeans who are better, all those 30 (and I left another 5 or 6 out) are not tied up. You are avoiding my continued question.... In Kevin Johnson we have a fighter who has never faced a top 50 opponent, that cant be right. Your arguement that he is the best out there is flawed. Kevin Johnson's management have done a great job and conned the boxing people.

 

So two wrongs make a right? Somebody who knows boxing... gimme a break!!!!!!

 

You have got to be kidding me. Ray Austin? Jason Estrada? Fres Oquendo? Evander Holyfield? Francois Botha?

 

There is no reason to complain about this fight at all. Grow up bitches...

 

Joe Collins IBO
Epic FAIL ...
and I am not reading past the first page here.
NO ONE on your list actually DESERVES a title shot. Half of them have already been beat by the Klitchko's. Then theres the ones who are shot to hell and shouldnt be fighting at all. There is one who might win a few more to get back into the game and the rest are to young to throw them away.

 

Thats what I have been telling this guy

 

Exactly

 

Johnson is way more deserving

 

Obviously I'm not the only one who thinks your a bit out there you might want to actually pay attention to whats going on in boxing stats and ranks are fine and dandy but the guys the prestigious IBO has in the top 30 are not all deserving either cant knock Vitali for fighting him and cant knock Johnson for taking his chance

 

I agree that many on the list dont deserve a shot, I actually said that,
but, they are more deserving than Kevin Johnson. which was the point..... convince me Kevin Johnson deserves a tite shot.... you cant because there is no reason. YOU HAVE BEEN CONNED BY THE 'O'. The reason he has not fought anyone in the top 50 is because his team knows he is likely to lose. You can look at the the old timers in that list but those are the fighters KJ should be beating to get a title shot.