To those who said Woods provides JC a bigger challenge than Hopkins

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008.


Page 2 of 7
  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,519
    15,938
    Jul 19, 2004
    Also, it's no coincidence that the same people who foolishly stated that Woods was a tougher challenge for Joe than Hopkins are the very same people who give Hopkins no credit for his win against Tarver.

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008
    Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008
    #16
  2. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    Indeed. They live in another universe. They are the ones who think Kessler and Calzaghe is God and that anyone they face would get destroyed. It's a joke.
     
    klion22, Apr 14, 2008
    klion22, Apr 14, 2008
    #17
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,519
    15,938
    Jul 19, 2004
    The lack of participation in this thread so far, in particular, the absense of the most vocal and delusional Calzaghe fans, speaks volumes.

    Some of them have some explaining to do.

    But **** it! I'll enjoy watching the barrage of ridiculous excuses one week from today.

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008
    Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008
    #18
  4. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Don't talk ****, mate. You know that is nowhere near accurate, so don't make up absolute lies to suit your anti-British bias.

    I, like many, thought Woods did pose a threat to Calzaghe. However, I also realise that Hopkins is a tougher fight for Calzaghe, even if Woods does have an edge stylistically. That is the opinion shared by the majority, I think.
     
    Jack, Apr 14, 2008
    Jack, Apr 14, 2008
    #19
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,519
    15,938
    Jul 19, 2004
    To me, it is nothing short of RIDICULOUS that anyone was foolish enough to believ Woods posed a greater challenge than Hopkins. It's simply inexplicable!

    And these same people usually are the first to discredit Hopkins's victory against Tarver.

    It's hysterical! You really cannot make this **** up.

    :lol:
     
    Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008
    Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008
    #20
  6. Beatboxer

    Beatboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,937
    2
    Mar 4, 2006
    All this serves to do is make Hopkins win over Tarver look better.

    Which in turn, shall make Calzaghe's victory over Hopkins look better still.

    You will be crying post Golota-Brewster creaming style come Sunday.

    After Joe comprehensively defeats the Old ******* by wiiideee UD.
     
    Beatboxer, Apr 14, 2008
    Beatboxer, Apr 14, 2008
    #21
  7. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,673
    101
    Jan 27, 2007
    that's because your calzaghe-hopkins threads are all one and the same.

    this time next week the Joe C mafia and team Calzaghe (headed by president jack presscot) will be running this forum, fo sho.

    :rasta
     
    ThePlugInBabies, Apr 14, 2008
    ThePlugInBabies, Apr 14, 2008
    #22
  8. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    :rofl I still stand firmly behind that statement. Hopkins will eat canvas on Sat.
     
    Arran, Apr 14, 2008
    Arran, Apr 14, 2008
    #23
  9. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,519
    15,938
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol:

    Nope. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, and I will be the first to admit such.

    I bet you doubt this yourself.

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008
    Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008
    #24
  10. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Depends how badly Hopkins gets whooped. Fairly badly I anticipate, therefore this will still be up for debate.
     
    TFFP, Apr 14, 2008
    TFFP, Apr 14, 2008
    #25
  11. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,519
    15,938
    Jul 19, 2004
    If I recall, you were one of the buffoons claiming Woods posed a greater challenge than Hopkins.

    What have you got to say for yourself, bucko?

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008
    Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008
    #26
  12. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,673
    101
    Jan 27, 2007
    you would be incorrect.
     
    ThePlugInBabies, Apr 14, 2008
    ThePlugInBabies, Apr 14, 2008
    #27
  13. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,519
    15,938
    Jul 19, 2004
    And you're still an idiot, too.

    :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
    Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008
    Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008
    #28
  14. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,519
    15,938
    Jul 19, 2004
    So you weren't amongst the braindead fanboys who said Woods (amongst many others) would pose a greater challenge for the overhyped Calzaghe than would Hopkins?

    You sure about that?

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008
    Rumsfeld, Apr 14, 2008
    #29
  15. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    Gotta love some angry Brits. They make this place a blast. :good
     
    Fedor Em, Apr 14, 2008
    Fedor Em, Apr 14, 2008
    #30
Page 2 of 7