To those who said Woods provides JC a bigger challenge than Hopkins

Simple Math:

Dawson + Pressure Fighter = Loss.

One Woods is equal to one Johnson pressure fighter give or take a little with Woods most likely being marginally in the negative range because in their trilogy Johnson arguable won 2/3 but for the sake of this equation we will use the variable 'P' for either fighter because of their uncanny similarities and the fact all fights could arguably have gone either way.

Now applying the ruleset observed this saturday past to the integer Dawson ('D') we can see that D + P = -D, a high probability of a loss. :deal

(Note: Being a southpaw like Tarver could introduce a random variable to the above equation on behalf of the integer 'D' but as that variable seemed null & void against a similar 'P' value fighter it is purely conjecture and must not be taken as an absolute in this circumstance)

 

Ha ha! Is that right? Well, Hopkins did a good job on Tarver, who did a number on Woods.

:hi:

 

That Hopkins is going to be tough for Joe in a way that Woods wouldn't have been.

 

Did you see those fights???

He should have won all three of those Woods fights. Lets not base our arguements on his fights with Johnson.

:good

 

Well, the Hopkins fight is in a different league imo.

:good

 

Woods fought like he had sold his title to Tarver,but was contracted to go through the motions.He was pathetic.

 

his toughest fight was against robin reid :smoke

 

He's got a better chin that's about it.

 

So what are the Hopkins sackhangers gonna say if Calzaghe does beat him? After all, Calzaghe is a 'sack of ****'. What would that make Hopkins, in your eyes?

 

Just answer the question.....what will your response to Calzaghe be if he does win? Are you man enough to take your hat off? Somehow I doubt it.