To those who think Pac-DLH is ridiculous cos of size difference

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by dangerousity, Jul 31, 2008.


  1. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Oh jomsky . . . you're making me crazy. :patsch

    Pride, dignity and honor? More important than money?

    Is it the reason why Pac . . . didn't accept the challenge of Casa, Campbell and JMM and is now targeting DLH? :huh :think

    I rest my case.

    :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :| :|
     
  2. jomzky

    jomzky in your mind Full Member

    412
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    I don't know, man. but point well taken, thanks.:good
    DLH is a legend, beating him is a big achievement and I think that's one of their motivation for this fight... although it's a long shot.
     
  3. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    n its boxing,anybody can fight anybody but Oscar started at 130 and Manny at 106,there is no way even a shot Oscar can lose to Pacquaio at 147 altough making weight will kill Oscar,that bull**** he was saing about not putting weight on after the weigh-in,he must think we are idiots
     
  4. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    i think this is just too much exaggeration...:-(

    anyone with a right mind would give pac full credit if he beats oscar...oscar is not that completely shot unlike gatti or jones, and the size difference alone would give him credit.

    But what if pac loses? who do we blame if pac loses just like the majority expected?
     
  5. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    even a hater would give pac full credit if he beats oscar..i don't see the the whole reason of this thread:-(
     
  6. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    Im talking about the people who would go as far as to calling this fight a circus act because they believe Pac beating DLH is impossible. Its not about giving credit, its about giving credit in equal amount as to how you doubted him.

    If you thought it was impossible for Pac to beat DLH, and Pac beats DLH, would you give him credit for "doing the impossible". That is alot of credit. Alot of people will give Pac credit but they will backtrack and act like what Pac did was very possible and nothing to go overboard about.

    Basically if you doubt Pac that much to the point that you would insult the fight then id expect you to worship him when he does win, because its all about giving credit in equal amount. ie: Those who thinks Hoya is shot now and Pac should win, I dont care if they dont give Pac full credit when he wins because they said it first time. Guys like PacDbest who thinks he will dominate DLH because hes so past prime shouldnt go jumping him to #1 of all time because he said it from start, DLH is so past prime and he expected it. Those saying this is 50/50 fight should give Pac 50% credit for winning. However for those saying Pac has 0% chance of winning, giving him equal credit would be giving him 100% credit when he wins.

    The way people are making it out to be is that Pac has 0% chance of winning, in the same manner he has 0% chance of beating Wlad. Id expect the same credit from those people as if Pac just beat Wlad. Just from those people, not the people who thinks Pac could realistically beat ODLH as anything is possible.
     
  7. stevebhoy87

    stevebhoy87 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,304
    5
    Dec 7, 2007
    If pac wins he deserves big time credit, i'm not really a pac fan and am a mayweather one but will say this, if pac beats oscar he'll go above mayweather in my atg p4p list, it would be a brilliant achievment, shot oscar or not
     
  8. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    yes and yes and yes...on all questions, and i don't think pac would win against DLH but nothing is impossible in boxing..so theres always a probability of winning even how difficult the task would be.

    Even if a pac-klitscho tooks place i say pac has about less less than 1% probability of winning because nothing is impossible in boxing. For example klitscho suddenly hurt his legs like or something and is unable to continue or some other scenario. Point is i give pac a small chance of winning
     
  9. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    I agree,it just amuses me when people say they'll 'admit' theyre wrong over a prediction as if they could possibly say they were right instead.:lol:
     
  10. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    Manny will win an "oscar" :lol:

    This content is protected
     
  11. Smazz20

    Smazz20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,856
    1
    Dec 19, 2006
    I'd give him huge credit. But I am one of the people who thinks this fight is a circus act. Far better figths out there for both men but both are going after the mega-money fight. The problem for DLH will be that he earns 0 respect for winning.
     
  12. joecaldragon

    joecaldragon Guest

    This is the perfect view of the fight. Respect
     
  13. jrios

    jrios Member Full Member

    362
    0
    Feb 18, 2006
    DLH is clearly not the same he was before, but I am still picking him to stop Pacman. I just don't see it. The size is far too much of an advantage. If somehow Pacman wins this fight then I will give him all the credit in the world and then some.
     
  14. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    It's not that Pacman has no chance. It's just that DLH can pick more competitive fights a lot closer to his own weight. This fight is solely for money. Hatton turned down DLH (Kudos to Hatton for that) so DLH is looking for the next biggest pay day. It's all about the money. That's what fans don't like.
     
  15. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    :hi: