Todays HW division is not so different than other eras

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by harrywh, Mar 27, 2009.


  1. Kaki

    Kaki Guest

    it's pure crap
     
  2. Kaki

    Kaki Guest

    :yepsure he knows it, the guy is a pure dumbass, he has a forced opinion and he kids himself, it's pathetic.
     
  3. TanstA

    TanstA Legendary Full Member

    1,428
    0
    Mar 13, 2007
    It's all about those exciting match ups and so for the past year and a half it's been Klitschko and Haye because of the odds between them.

    All the other great fights happen at the lower classes : (
     
  4. See Me Flow

    See Me Flow The Pharaoh of Boxing Full Member

    6,482
    2
    Jul 20, 2004
    Toney Tucker was no joke. This guy could really box. He had quality skills, possessed fundamentals most heavyweights today lack and had ideal size. Tucker would be the linear champion in todays HW division.
     
  5. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  6. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    the klitschkos had nothing to do with sam peter coming in at 265 pounds...hes done in because hes lazy and doesnt train.
     
  7. BULLFROMBORNEO

    BULLFROMBORNEO Active Member Full Member

    514
    2
    Nov 29, 2008
    Certain people really need to open their eyes.


    This is, by far, thee worst era in the HW division, and if you don't think it's the worst then you surely can't put it any higher than the bottom ****ing three. Christ all mighty, a SHOT version of Shannon Briggs became a titlist and you're telling me that this isn't the worst era the division has seen? Outside of the Klitschkos, and a couple others to a very VERY lesser degree what else is there?

    Samuel Peter wouldn't have gotten close to a belt in the 80s or 90s.