Tokyo Douglas vs Rocky Marciano

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lepinthehood, Feb 13, 2015.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,609
    46,244
    Feb 11, 2005
    Pretty sure I didn't make a firm pick in that thread but you can do the research for yourself.

    And by the by, my real pick for that matchup has remained the sams both before and after the Stiverne affair.
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,582
    27,245
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  3. Phil_Ivey_76

    Phil_Ivey_76 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,823
    175
    Aug 26, 2013
    Rocky Marciano KO between 6 and 10

    Tokyo Douglas is WAY overrated. He'd be a poor version of Charles (who was good when he fought Rocky)
     
  4. Phil_Ivey_76

    Phil_Ivey_76 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,823
    175
    Aug 26, 2013
    Also Rocky woulda KO'd Tokyo Tyson
     
  5. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    I just think its a shame that this new sports science has spoiled the spectacle that heavyweight boxing once was. The division should exemplify everything that is seen in the lighter divisions but with bigger men. Instead we have jab and grab because pace has effected the ability to overcome reach. A manager just needs to find a jess Willard sized kid with long arms because anything shorter is handicapped through carrying too much weight.
     
  6. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Quick tip for the shorter guys, don't carry too much weight....
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,995
    48,080
    Mar 21, 2007
    The heavyweight division of the 90s was superb; it contained many of these bigger men. Furthermore, guys like Tyson or Holyfield would undoubtedly be in the top three in this division, possibly one of them would be top one. It's a dearth of quality rather than a significant change IMO.

    At the very least, the jury is out on whether or not some seismic change has taken place.

    In my opinion, this has never been the case. Louis and Ali aside, there are really no boxers to equally the very sensational smaller men on film. The little guys are clearly better and it's just science is all. Body mechanics and gravity just says that you'll be faster with a better engine at a comfortable 130 than you will at a comfortable 190.



    And really, if you look at the top ten, very few of them fight in this "jab and grab" style at all. Really it's just Wlad. The others that try it, they aren't very good at it.
     
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    The 1990s was a good decade, perhaps a transitional period of skilful heavyweights and skilful tall heavyweight who built themselves up into powerhouse super heavyweights. The best fighters had one foot in the 1980s like Tyson, Ruddock, Bruno and Holyfeild. Holmes and Foreman one foot in the 1970s. Then you had Olympians come to the fore like Mercer, Lewis and Bowe as well as bodybuilders like Tua, Ibeabuchi, Morrison and Moorer who had moves. With the exception of Bowe and Lewis I don't think anybody was naturally any bigger than the 1970s heavyweights and even Bowe and Lewis had proberbly developed as lighter fighters. The rot set in once the generation of fighters who never boxed bellow 225lb-240lb who started out with a limited pace.


    oh I think there's been some other good skilful heavyweights like Tunney, Sharkey, Wallcott, Charles, Patterson, Quarry, Ellis, Holmes. Even non champions like Truth Williams, zora Folley, Machen, Witherspoon and Tubbs could really box. Holyfeild, Moorer, Toney and Bryd. But as you say it's usually the smaller ones.

    But there's a lot of heavier heavyweights who cannot overcome a reach disadvantage isn't there? Spurt fighters who huff and puff half the round in order to save up an explosive burst. Not to mention ten year prospects with fewer genuinely competative fights under their belt than at any other time in history.
     
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Interesting thoughts. :good
    Yes, doesn't have to be 6'4 and 230, if we can find the biggest/best.
    I agree with you on Foreman.
    Foreman's a nasty match up for anyone that small, even at 45 years old.
    Or anyone who comes in.

    It's probably wrong to assume Marciano couldn't nuance his style a bit. Yes, he'll always be a come-forward fighter with a short reach, but he could probably ratchet up his "cageyness" if presented with a bigger man. I don't want to credit Marciano with something he never did, just assume that he uses skills and thinks ... which I believe he did.

    I'd pick him to beat Frank Bruno, for a start, personally. Whether Bruno is better than Rahman, I'll let others decide. :good
     
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    50-50 against Ruddock.
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yeah, for sure.
     
  12. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    Douglas fights like he did in that one fight. Hard fast accurate jab, and big uppercuts, and straight right hands, Marciano doesn't last as long as Tyson did.
     
  13. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Unless the fight is set for 15 rounds in which case big bus would sacrifice a lot if that workrate. With less work Rocky is in the fight that bit more each round.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,995
    48,080
    Mar 21, 2007
    This isn't true of Ruslan Chagaev, David Haye, Alex Povetkin, Vitali Klitschko, Kubrat Pulev, Tony Thompson etc etc.

    At the very, very least your position is unproven because the theory hasn't been tested. I think there just aren't very many good heavies around right now. The idea that the division has gotten intrinsically worse because the fighters that they have got better is flat out wrong in my view.


    There hundreds of "skilled heavyweights" and i'm obviously not saying otherwise. I'm just saying that this idea you have of the HW division being bigger men doing what the smaller men do isn't something it has ever been under MOQ.


    Of course; it's a difficult thing to do at any weight.

    But this idea you seem to have that "modern heavyweights" are all about jab & grab is false. Lewis fought like that in his big fights perhaps as much as half the time, but maybe not. I mean it was a part of his game, but it wasn't his game. Vitali didn't fight like that at all, really. Tyson Fury is another one, but he got dropped by Steve Cunningham so it's hardly like he's very good at it :lol: Who else? Hardly anyone else. It's really just Wladamir that has learned to do that, and he is so exceptionally good at that by my eyes at least, there aren't many fighters from any era who could expect to beat him, regardless of what weight they are.
     
  15. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    Tbh, I don't think it makes any difference. The key to Tokyo was Buster was having huge success, very early. From the second round onwards virtually everything he threw, landed " effectively " jabs snapping Tysons head back, right hands and left hooks knocking him off balance with next to nothing coming back. That gives a fighter more of an adrenaline rush than most things.

    I do believe Tyson was a far stronger man than Marciano. I do not believe that the extra 20 - 25 lbs he carried than Rocky was flab at any time of his career, and certainly not in Tokyo.

    I firmly believe that Marciano was as easy or easier to hit than Tyson, and again that weight and strength difference would mean the success Douglas had in Tokyo would be more pronounced in a fight with Rocky.

    I dont see it going past 8, with Marciano stopped whilst trying to get up for more. Much like Tyson in fact but 2 or 3 rounds earlier.