Tomasz Adamek vs. Steve Cunningham II RBR

What rounds did you gave to each fighter? Just wondering.

Anyway I have no problem with a fighter fighting on the outside if he is being more active Cunningham which he was and landing the cleaner punches which Cunningham also did. Adamek would in a lot of the rounds do very little until closing stages of the rounds instead of working for the 3 minutes.

 

80% on his bike? stfu

 

You made absolutely no reference to ticket sales. You made a simple statement of causality. Your failure to elaborate on your oversimplification in order to get your point across to anyone who can't read your mind is entirely your fault. Better luck next time, fool.

 

Jesus ****, MW is right on this one. :barf

 

Report for Ban :good

Racist mother****er

 

atsch

Pulev will embarrass Adamek

 

Thin-skinned *****.

 

Support = Buying tickets/PPV

Support =/= Cheering in a crowd

When talking boxing, support refers to $$ not cheering.... You view the world through the eyes of a child or very simplistic man

 

Even though the decision sucks check out the stats..

This content is protected

Maybe the first account of the fight wasn't corrupt? Adamek was the aggressor and landed more power punches. Cunningham was fighting backfoot and landed more punches altogether. I dunno, you can make a case for a draw depending on how you judge. I think judging itself needs a overhaul and be way more clear.

 

Make a racist statement about Blacks or Latinos on this board and you will be banned....

Just trying to keep things fair here... Or do you believe certain people deserve to be treated with more respect than others? :think

 

I never really bother with Compu box stats as it is just two guys counting punches and doesn't tell how cleanly the punches are landing or how hard the punches are, also as far as I am aware a power punch on compu box is anything outside of a Jab.

Although Adamek was the aggressor throughout the fight, was his agrression effective in enough rounds to win, effective agression, clean punches, ring generalship and defence are the 4 scoring criteria.

 

I wouldn't pick USS over Pulev, but he at least earned the chance.

I don't have a problem with Adamek, but he didn't win tonight.

 

"Power shots" pretty much just means "not a jab," correct? A lot of Adamek's power shots were largely blocked or ineffective. I'd say they landed about an equal number of truly big punches.

Meanwhile, many of Cunningham's jabs were stiff, effective punches that marked Adamek up. It's ridiculous to just act like those somehow don't count.

In any case, round by round, Cunningham was the clear winner.

 

Ne1 have a pic of the scorecards?

 

If you think the connotation of "support" in boxing is that specific, then it appears English is not your first language and you don't understand how silly you look in attempting to worm yourself out of the hole you've dug. You made an ambiguous over-simplification in your original post that I quoted. You probably meant cheering all along and that's why you refuse to admit you simply made an unclear statement.

Tell me this: there were Cunningham fans ringside tonight. When they cheered for Cunningham and booed Adamek, would you call them Adamek supporters simply because they paid for tickets?