I think you are on drugs or strong tequila, people can read and he wrote: He's (ADAMEK) not close to being there yet .... Bell is .... flattered Cunningham...meh he's okay ..... Flores is a complete unknown ..... Adamek ..... This content is protected then you said: " This content is protected " :nut Now get lost
atsch Then what are you disagreeing with me for? How about you respond to my post, instead of making half arsed remarks. Whsat would Adamek need to do to make the HOF, based on the fact he has only had a couple of dubious victories against contenders, beaten a former champ who is very inconsistent, and has ONE close victory over a current champ in a very lacklustre division. Also keep in mind the fact he has been schooled by Dawson, and has struggled on multiple occasions aggainst guys on his current resume. BE REALISTIC! Keeping in mind the current state of the division also. Give names, and keep in mind the criteria to be inducted into the HOF. If you cant' respond to my posts in full, dont' bother with your crappy one line comments that have absolutely no relelveance to ANYTHING in my posts.
You are so full of ****:rofl, and now you going to make a fool of yourself again. That is his post above. You haven't read his post properly, and once again in this post, haven't responded to it properly again. I think you probably can't read:good Leaving out half the post when summarising it, doesn't make your point valid champ. This was your response to my acknowledgment of his post. You said that i considered that both i and TFFP considered Alexeev to be a gatekeeper for a HOF status. What you didn't do, was READ the post, where it said that he needed to go on to bigger things, make a much bigger name for himself. THEN that Adamek would need to not only win, but also make a lot of consistent defences and gain more belts to give him DEPTH OF RESUME Read the post next time atschatsch
Alright, just so everyone is clear, PolishPummler has withdrawn himself from the discussion on the grounds of stupidity as he cant' respond to any point:rofl You fail at life:good
You fail to realize that i have been there and done that 10x over which is why i choose to laught at people like you. Just remember you can tear down his resume as much as possible and you can bring up Dawson as much as possible(you arent the first to go that route and make Dawson seem to be the only credible foe he has faced)VERY PREDICTABLE)but Ring mag and there top 10 rankings have more credibilty than your word or mine.The guys you tear down were all top 10 so it dont matter.hi:
I like Adamek but he's going to have to do more to get to the HOF. First he must rematch USS in the FOTY IMO the public demands it. Next clean out the divison and possibly move up and win a title at HW of he does that he's a HOF for sure if he never goes to HW and cleans out CW he's a borderline HOF fighter.
Nah you just have no idea what you are talking about, and no way of responding to my posts. Its clear as day for everyone reading the thread mate. Your personal bias regarding Adamek has reached frightening levels. Its always been this way though. I was on the site back even when you used to go by your old username. You've never changed, always hugged the **** out of Adamek's nuts. You did the same with Golota as well. Its hard to take someone seriously who is so overwhelmed with nationalistic pride.
And you are who??? Around for less than a month and this guy has my entire existance figured out:shock:
Ok then there Mr....other than being a loyal supporter you are more than welcome to use the search feature and use any of my words against me. To bad you never chose to engage then as you would find that i am more than reasonable and have never painted Adamek as anything other than the former WBC 175lb champ and the current CW Champ.Any other delusions are all in your head. To bad you never chose to engage me then, before or after the Briggs,Dawson,Bell,and Cunningham fights as you find that although i stick with my fighter i am reasonable and honest in victory and defeat. As far as Golota....WTF:huh
I have argued with you in the past over it, you obviously don't rememeber. Regardless, it was ages ago, i'm definitely not searching through all your posts to find it. If you don't believe me i don't really care. The way you have handled this discussion, avoiding all the points you cant' repsond to should be proof enough for anyone reading. I've never had a problem with you as a poster, EXCEPT regarding Golota and Adamek, i find you are extremely biased when discussing them. Of course you won't agree, lets just leave it at that.
Over what????The **** you made up in your head. Golota....does every polish person have to be a hardcore Golota fan(in your imaginary World). Again i ask for some examples of what it is that has you are so frustrated and flustered???
Don't even bother arguing with haters like Jambon. He's just a disgruntled Aussie crying because Adamek retired his boy Paul Briggs. No logical argument will make him change his mind.
