Tommy Hearns vs Andre Dirrell at 168?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by realsoulja, Oct 12, 2010.


  1. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    I know for some reason people over the past 16 months have become the biggest Andre Dirrell fans, but let's get real. The poll options ought to be:
    Hearns KO 1-4
    Hearns KO 5-8
    Hearns KO 9-12
    Hearns UD
     
  2. sillyjoow

    sillyjoow Active Member Full Member

    1,459
    1
    Dec 19, 2008
    is this a joke thread? If not i pick hearns
     
  3. dcantwell

    dcantwell Member Full Member

    340
    0
    May 8, 2007

    That's Funny...
     
  4. the quiet man

    the quiet man Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,554
    1
    Apr 20, 2010
    hearns could box a bit when he wanted to. tommy would outbox dirrell, then blow him out with a big shot.
     
  5. Duck Dodgers

    Duck Dodgers Kimbo #1 P4P Full Member

    7,057
    5
    Sep 16, 2010
    Possibly worst thread ever.
     
  6. Bajingo

    Bajingo Boxing Junkie banned

    14,050
    0
    Nov 15, 2009
    Hearns TKO due to sand in the vagina of Dirrell.
     
  7. hewito

    hewito Guest

    Who cares..why people insist on "fantasy boxing"...Go back to work!
     
  8. Lunny

    Lunny Guest

    Dirrell runs and slips about claiming fouls and behind the head and low punches and generally stinks the place out prior to a decapitation.
     
  9. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Hearns wasn't nearly the same fighter @ 168 as he was earlier in his career at 147 & 154 (or even 160), but I'm still inclined to pick Tommy here.
     
  10. EJDiaZ

    EJDiaZ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,213
    420
    Aug 21, 2010
  11. Tyler-Durden

    Tyler-Durden Boxing Junkie banned

    11,190
    1
    Mar 24, 2010
    This would be an easy fight for Tommy. But i still pick Dirrell by brutal acting performance.

    [url]
    This content is protected
    [/url]