Tommy Hearns vs Bob Foster @175

Foster would decimate Barkley. Come on man you know it too.

 

sure, but I never saw Barkley decimated.. Benn knocked him out, although I would have loved to have seen how that fight would go without the 3 knockdown rule which on that fight was not a good rule.

 

I agree Benn fouled Barkley. But regardless he was on Barkley like stink on #### that was was Benns day. I see Barkley ending up like Tiger to be honest.

 

Probably. he didn't have great defense. The funny thing is I think had the rematch of Hearns/Barkley been scheduled for 15 rounds, Hearns would have stopped him. That is a case where a longer distance would help Hearns. I think Barkley was ready to go.

 

Yeah who knocked him out?

 

That's an execution

 

Good God. This would end ugly for Tommy.

 

Barkley vs BOB FOSTER?????

Do you hate Iran or something?

Talk about a mismatch.

 

Just mentioning it would be interesting. Not many guys knocked out Barkley or down with one punch.

 

It wouldn't be interesting. It would be an execution. It's a mismatch of class, a mismatch of size, and a mismatch of styles.

The Blade goes 3... TOPS!

More than likely end inside of 2.

This is a man who was bounced up and down by Nigel Benn, and you're wondering how he handles the power of BOB FOSTER????

 

I would favor Foster but wouldn't be surprised if Hearns outboxed him. Who were the best Bob defended against at 75?

 

Hearns does well up until Foster catches him and knocks him out.

 

Food for thought: Hearns' win over Hill is arguably a greater win at 175 than anything Foster has on his resume, not even factoring in the weight jump for Hearns.

 

Dick Tiger > Virgil Hill

Eddie Cotton > Virgil Hill

Finnegan, Ahumada, Hank, Rondon, and fourie would have been difficult fights for Hill

 

A 22 loss Eddie Cotton was not better than Virgil Hill. That's complete bull****.

Tiger was old and in the wrong weightclass; there's an argument to be made that Hill was better at the time of those fights.