Tommy Hearns Vs Carl Froch ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Joeywill, Aug 3, 2021.

  1. Joeywill

    Joeywill New Member Full Member

    73
    66
    Aug 2, 2021
    At 168. Who wins?
     
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,092
    12,376
    May 4, 2017
    Hearns wasn`t very impressive at 168, in the few fights he had at that weight he didn`t stop anyone so Froch should have been able to take Tommy`s power pretty, the problem is Froch waas very easy to hit and Hearns did stop Andrie at 175, however by the time Hearns moved to 168 he had lost half a step and his KO ratio went through the floor after 1987, I`d say it would be a 50/50 fight despite Tommy having a far better reume P4P.
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his ├žock 'macho' that's ok by me Full Member

    373,533
    55,083
    Nov 30, 2006
    Cobra vs. Cobra...but the Nottingham species would end up prey for the apex variant from Motor City.
     
  4. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,104
    15,040
    Apr 4, 2005
    Hearns is one of my favourite fighters but at 168lbs he was well above his best weight and someone like Froch who had the chin to take his power at this higher weight and who would just keep coming, I could see Froch taking everything Hearns threw at him only to come from behind and stop Hearns much like Barkley did.

    Maybe Hearns can survive and win a decision but either way I don't think Hearns has an easy time dealing with Froch.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  5. Conteh'sLeft

    Conteh'sLeft Active Member Full Member

    865
    1,547
    May 23, 2021
    Hearns would get knocked out at 168 , he adjusted his pace at 175 in his win against Hill but Froch is still too big, too strong for Tommy.
     
  6. Trevor Diamante

    Trevor Diamante New Member Full Member

    58
    64
    Jun 13, 2021
    I never understood the too big too strong canard. Tommy was a very strong and muscuylar 175 pounder and was able to go the distance with huge Barkley who went up as far as HW, and fight Virgil Hill a natural 175 and win, and Kinchen who had a lot of power. What about Froch showed he is " too big too strong".
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2021
  7. Conteh'sLeft

    Conteh'sLeft Active Member Full Member

    865
    1,547
    May 23, 2021
    Barkley was tailor made for Tommy still he couldn't keep him off and lost both times , when Hearns fought Kinchen he was dropped twice and almost koed in the fourth and the only reason that fight went to him was because Kinchen didn't press him enough and was just content tagging Hearns at will .

    He won the Hill fight because Hill was trying to outbox Hearns and never planned to use his size advantage so naturally Hearns was the superior jabber and the boxer so he won the fight.

    Froch had much better stamina and power and has proven his mettle against solid competition at 168 , there's no way Hearns isn't getting Taylored.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  8. vast

    vast Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,668
    4,112
    Nov 27, 2010
    Froch would be able to take Hearns power shots, which were most effective when Tommy was a WW. Carl had a solid jaw, was tenacious and tough. Froch by ko rd 8.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  9. mark ant

    mark ant Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,092
    12,376
    May 4, 2017
    Hearns was muscular at 175 v Andries but against Hill, Leonard 2nd fight and Barkley rematch his body was softer and he looked quite slow, I really don`t think he looked as quck v Hill as he did at welter but he was as quick as Froch and would have a reach advantage, his long jab could win him this fight like it did v Hill who threw more jabs than Froch did.
     
    m.s. likes this.
  10. mark ant

    mark ant Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,092
    12,376
    May 4, 2017
    Maybe but Hearns showed amazing power at 154 destroying Duran.
     
  11. mark ant

    mark ant Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,092
    12,376
    May 4, 2017
    All Hill had was a jab, he wasn`t a powerful light heavy at all.
     
  12. Olu G. Rotimi

    Olu G. Rotimi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,284
    4,210
    May 29, 2007
  13. Conteh'sLeft

    Conteh'sLeft Active Member Full Member

    865
    1,547
    May 23, 2021
    Still I believe he could've done a bit better had he not tried just to outbox Hearns.
     
  14. Conteh'sLeft

    Conteh'sLeft Active Member Full Member

    865
    1,547
    May 23, 2021
    Did you even see the weight mentioned in the post?
     
    Somali Sanil likes this.
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    68,767
    9,374
    Sep 15, 2009
    I think Hearns dominates up until the point Froch knocks him out.

    I see it going much like Hearns vs Leonard 1.

    Hearns will just light him up from the outside, Froch will have no joy with his jab, his footwork will take him no where, and he's gonna lose the timing battle.

    At some point late on, when miles behind, Froch bites down on his gumshield and goes to war, a war Hearns can't survive.