Tommy Hearns Vs Carl Froch ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Joeywill, Aug 3, 2021.

  1. Olu G. Rotimi

    Olu G. Rotimi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,284
    4,210
    May 29, 2007
    My point exactly.
     
  2. Young Terror

    Young Terror ★ Griselda ★ Full Member

    4,483
    1,524
    May 9, 2012
    Had they not fought you would be saying the same thing about iran Barkley and Hearns .

    And how did that went?
     
    Brighton bomber likes this.
  3. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,104
    15,040
    Apr 4, 2005
    People will try and ignore the Barkley fights or say Barkley was some amazing fighter when he had already 7 losses on his record when facing Hearns.

    Froch like Barkley was big, strong and durable and while there's no doubt Hearns was more skilled and had so many more weapons. I'm sure Hearns could out box Froch and win on points but he would probably try for the KO because Hearns liked a tear up at times and with an opponent he would at times dominate and find easy to hit, he'd probably try and take him out and Froch would eventually catch up with him at some point late and turn the fight on it's head like we saw when Hearns fought SRL and Barkley and even Hagler and we saw Froch achieve vs Taylor and Groves.

    Hearns is the greater fighter and I much prefer him as a fighter but even as a big Hearns fan I can't help but think this match up doesn't bode well for him based on both fighters track records. It feels like sacrilege to say it as Hearns is so great but styles makes fights and this is at least 2 divisions above Hearn's best weight.
     
    Young Terror likes this.
  4. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Full Member

    13,902
    10,954
    Jun 9, 2007
    Hearns beats the brakes off him
     
    Olu G. Rotimi likes this.
  5. J Jones

    J Jones Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,592
    1,136
    Jul 19, 2017
    Virgil Hill treats the hittable and smaller Froch like a double-end bag: jab, jab, jab for a 9-3 or 10-2 type decision.
     
  6. northpaw

    northpaw Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,122
    4,351
    Jun 5, 2010
    I see a lot of comments saying that Tommy had no power at SMW, as if Tommy wasn't very likely one of the 20 most highly skilled boxer punchers ever. Whether he could stop Froch or not isn't very relevant, he could most assuredly outbox him over 12. Plus, let's not forget despite Froch's phenomenal chin and durability, he has been hurt and dropped before, and by guys that didn't punch as sharp as Tommy.
    And let's be honest, a hands down style against an elite jabber like Tommy? Nah.............

    Also, people pointing to what Barkley did, 1: some guys are just other guys nightmares, 2: Barkley would've been hell against Froch as well. Barkley (despite his record being peppered with losses) was hell for everyone he was in the ring with.

    Tommy UD over Froch

    Disclaimer: I think Froch was a beast
     
    Olu G. Rotimi likes this.
  7. cuchulain

    cuchulain Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,698
    2,503
    Jan 6, 2007
    Hearns takes this...118 -110, give or take a round.

    On a different level skill wise.
     
  8. Dodgy Syrup

    Dodgy Syrup Active Member banned Full Member

    856
    772
    Mar 20, 2019
    Fair enough, so he was actually legit at those heavier weights?

    That's impressive.

    For a man to fight at welterweight, and be well regarded, and to then end up fighting quality opposition at cruiserweight, is quite the feat.

    I must confess, I wasn't as informed about Tommy's career as I should have been and I was basing my assessment off of him primarily being a welter/middleweight.

    I wasn't aware of how impressive he was at those bigger weights.

    In my original comment I basically boiled it down to Hearns being the much more sophisticated boxer, with better all round ability, and gave it to Froch either late on or by points.

    Mainly, i concede, because I didn't think he had as much pedigree at light heavy and cruiser and would be considered the naturally smaller man.

    That said, I still say we can never know for certain and it is all opinion...which is fine, that's mostly what a forum - people offering opinions.
     
    Olu G. Rotimi likes this.
  9. Olu G. Rotimi

    Olu G. Rotimi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,284
    4,210
    May 29, 2007
    He was a freak of nature because it was unbelievable he could make Welterweight. There are even video clips of him sparring with an older Muhammad Ali and giving him a hard time.
     
  10. Olu G. Rotimi

    Olu G. Rotimi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,284
    4,210
    May 29, 2007
    Spot on with your post.
     
    northpaw likes this.
  11. m.s.

    m.s. Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,661
    1,895
    Nov 2, 2010
    Tommy would out box him as long as he respected Froch and didn't get too careless.
     
  12. Sap1en

    Sap1en Active Member Full Member

    901
    900
    Dec 1, 2020
    Froch, Hearns was great but I think he has too much for Hearns at 168.
     
  13. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,451
    5,773
    May 8, 2014
    Froch takes a beating then knocks Tommy out late.