Tommy Hearns vs Jerry Quarry

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Primadonna Kool, Mar 8, 2010.


  1. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    im surprised this thread has made it so far. Such an easy fight for Quarry.
     
  2. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    Yeah, but some people just see "Tommy Hearns" and assume that he'll perform at 200 like he did at 154 against someone of Quarry's ability.
     
  3. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    Quarry is too tough imo if he can go that long with Frazier who hits harder then Hearns then I'll go for Jerry any day.
     
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,179
    25,430
    Jan 3, 2007
    Pound for pound, this is not even close in terms of who was the better fighter, but in a head to head sense, I can't favor Hearns at all... Tommy would have been stretching himself razor thin at these levels, and Jerry was a destoyer in his prime who beat literally handfuls of good heavyweights... If Hearns opted to be super cautious, he might have won a few of the early rounds, perhaps even lasted a while.. But Jerry is going to get him at some point.
     
  5. enquirer

    enquirer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,206
    26
    Mar 18, 2006
    Comedy thread.
    Hearns had all the trouble in the world with a bruiser like barkley at 175.
    Any version of hearns,even on hgh and dianobol loses inside and badly.
    Come on guys...