Yeah, but some people just see "Tommy Hearns" and assume that he'll perform at 200 like he did at 154 against someone of Quarry's ability.
Quarry is too tough imo if he can go that long with Frazier who hits harder then Hearns then I'll go for Jerry any day.
Pound for pound, this is not even close in terms of who was the better fighter, but in a head to head sense, I can't favor Hearns at all... Tommy would have been stretching himself razor thin at these levels, and Jerry was a destoyer in his prime who beat literally handfuls of good heavyweights... If Hearns opted to be super cautious, he might have won a few of the early rounds, perhaps even lasted a while.. But Jerry is going to get him at some point.
Comedy thread. Hearns had all the trouble in the world with a bruiser like barkley at 175. Any version of hearns,even on hgh and dianobol loses inside and badly. Come on guys...