Tommy Hearns Vs. Joe Calzaghe...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BOONDOCK SAINT, Nov 24, 2008.


  1. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    2
    Sep 30, 2007
    Calzaghe UD or late rounds stoppage.
     
  2. californicator

    californicator Active Member Full Member

    537
    3
    Feb 2, 2007
    prideofwales and english titan: you are smoking too much crack. tommy would belt calzaghe. sorry u brits. i understand the need to support your own fighters but let's not lie to achieve what you want. n00bs
     
  3. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    2
    Sep 30, 2007

    Same could be said for the Yanks.

    I mean youve got no talent anymore as your only half decent fighter retired early.

    So obviously you have to delve back into the past:lol:

    But seriously whilst both Leonard and Hearns are all time greats they where not great 168lbers.
     
  4. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Calzaghe by knockout. No question about it either. Certainly the early Calzaghe at the weight when he put more muster into his shots.
     
  5. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Stay off the drugs. :lol:
     
  6. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Going by Hearns's showings against Kinchen, Leonard, and Olajide at super-middleweight, he doesn't beat Calzaghe. All those went the distance and his punch resistance was anything but solid.

    Hearns' performances at the weight need to be looked at, and not what he done in other weight classes.
     
  7. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,097
    1,094
    Jul 19, 2004
    this thread is why i beleive calzaghe will be better regarded in 20 years than he is now.

    fighters lose a lot of flaws in retirement in people`s perceptions and there poor fights are forgotton , only remembered for what they once did good and not for any hiccups along the way.
     
  8. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    :nut
     
  9. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    Calzaghe doesn't deserve to be in the same sentence as Hearns let alone the same ring.
     
  10. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Hearns needs to be in the ring for a prediction on who would win.

    :huh
     
  11. elTerrible

    elTerrible TeamElite General Manager Full Member

    11,392
    15
    May 24, 2006

    :rofl:rofl


    You know **** all about boxing mate. What does his Roy Jones win have to do with anything? Jones is almost 40.

    Hearns at 168 was better than Jones of 2008. Hearns at 168 would KO Jones of 2008 absolutely no doubt, something that Calzaghe didnt do, either because he couldnt or he carried him.
     
  12. miketysonko

    miketysonko Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,371
    317
    Dec 29, 2006
    Get real guys, Calzaghe isn't even in the same league as The Hitman, this is just redicilous, comparing him to the 40 year old Jones...
     
  13. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    2
    Sep 30, 2007
    Whilst Jones is 40 Calzaghe is 37/38.

    Sorry but most Americans havent ever seen a prime Calzaghe.
     
  14. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    Hearns Ko's him at any weight.
     
  15. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Calzaghe wins, and I'd have felt good enough about it to bet money on it. Hearns performances at that weight give me no reason to pick him over Calzaghe. I can't believe people actually think Hearns would knock him out, because his knockout power wasn't even there at the higher weights.