Tommy Hearns vs Julian Jackson At LMW

Hearns wins 9 outta 10. He was a much better boxer then Jackson, and quicker to the punch.

 

It's a toss up. Definitley would end in a knockout either way. I say Hearns because of his boxing ability and speed.

 

As a famous General once said: "The winner will be the who gets there first-est with the most-est."

 

Hearns in round 1

 

Hearns and early.

Both dynamite punchers but Hearns the much better boxer.

 

Jackson would always present a threat but I think Hearns would employ the Motor City Cobra tactics and outbox him. Jackson's only hope would be for Hearns to stand flatfooted and try to take Jackson out, but Jackson landing first. Even if Hearns opted to stand toe to toe, he could take Jackson out, but it would be risky because Jackson could also take him out. I think Hearns would put the ego aside and move and box smartly.

I think Hearns would win by late round tko.

 

It would be similar to McCallum vs Jackson but probably quicker

 

He arms in one or Jackson in three.

 

I agree with this...I think Hearns would respect and box the oncoming Jackson...both give each other more respect than expected. Hearns decision.

 

jackson by ko... hearns would be dominating in the moment of the ko.. single shot... glass chin + power of jackson= you are ****ed

 

Hearns by late round Kayo, 11th round.