Tommy Hearns would KILL Floyd Mayweather

In all your whining you missed my point. In a thread this ridiculous you decide to argue with someone who makes a simple but true statement like the one I made rather than the fool who's arguing that all these LW's would beat Hearns.

I have rewatched the Mayweather/Castillo fight from the first time. First time I had Floyd winning pretty clearly in a close fight. The second time I had it pretty much a draw, and I could see how so many people felt Castillo won. It felt like he did to me as well. So actually, rewatching the fight has changed my opinion more in favor of Castillo than anything.

The Mayweather fans are always the ones to bring up the flawed punchstats, yet they get mad when someone does the same in a case against them?

 

The Mayweather fans are always the ones to bring up the flawed punchstats, yet they get mad when someone does the same in a case against them?



Indeed. A trait that spills unto other topics as well. Hypocrisy is a mother****er.

 

..

 

Hagler is too big ... Floyd has peaked out at WW and was pushing it going up to 154 ... 160 would be too big a leap.

 

What are you talking about ... Height and Power don't matter ... if they did the history books wouldn't look like they do now.

 

I never in my ****ing life used punch stats to determine whether Floyd or any fighter won a fight. Not even in if it benefits me. It is bull****. They count any meaningless flurry and shoe shine punches. Floyd does not shoe shine or waste punches so compubox would never favor him in a close fight.

 

I disagree, size means nothing. Hagler showed that movement troubles him against Leonard, Floyd would just do the same thing. Hagler lost to a WW as well. Floyd by UD.

 

:think No need to be defensive as i was clearly quoting Sweet Pea and agreeing with his disgust toward "Fans" such as Bigtime9 and his ilk. You can be sure that i would call you out directly were it the case.

 

:yikes Oh, i get it now...

 

And Leonard was inactive for 3 years for crying out loud. Don't get me wrong, Hagler was great and had very good power but Floyd doesn't slug with anyone, like seriously he would pot shot him to a decision.

 

It's situational. When these attributes become really apparent is when the fighter has every other conceivable advantage to.

 

Too big? Oh the irony.

 

In the case of a fighter that started off at 130 and has never had a legit reign at 154 and above means alot.

Can you say Vinnie Paz

 

:rofl:good

 

How dare you compare Floyd with Vinny Paz. He was far more skilled fighter and he even beat Oscar De La Hoya. Hagler has nothing to offer that Oscar didn't. Floyd would pot-shot Hagler to a Decision win, easier than Leonard did, as Leonard had just gotten back from a long lay-off. It's obvious you're just a hater.