Ring's Annual heavyweight ratings only list him twice in his career, both times at number 9. He was blip on the radar. A hard hitting blip but a blip none the less.
I wouldn't make Morrison the favorite against even someone like Kallie Knoetze. Morrison might have a lot more exposure but I don't think he was any better, or more dangerous a fighter.
I think moreso how he still gets talked about on forums 30 years later when some much better fighters are all but forgotten.
Dude went to war with Foreman and literally lumped him up. Morrison literally ran in one of the most negative boxing performances you will ever see from a scared puncher.
If the performance was even close to being that negative Morrison wouldn't have connected 260 times. By your logic any fighter who uses movement to win has an unworthy, "cowardly" victory. Last time I checked sporadic running isn't illegal, whereas spitting out your mouthpiece (Stewart), throwing low blows (Foreman) and frequent clinching is. It was a sound tactical performance and victory, the likes of which Stewart and Moorer didn't come close to replicating.
This is a technicality due to his losses always occurring late in the year. He was top 10 Ring ranked in 22 individual months and ranked 4th for 5 months.
It's hardly a technicality. He was a known commodity from 91-95 and barely scratched the mean because he couldn't maintain consistency and was a one-trick pony. Nobody but nobody considered him a threat at that time. He was marketable and that was it.
Saying "he finished the year 9th in two years" obscures the length of his stay in the top 10, as well as the fact that he had a peak ranking five places higher. He entered the top 10 in November 1992 and was still there 2 years later. Just read that he re-entered the rankings for at least 4 months after beating Ruddock, possibly 6, so 26-28 months in the top 10 over 3 years. He was consistently in the top 10 from Nov 1992 until the end of 1995 and has retirement, occupying a spot about 70% of the time. "Nobody but nobody considered him a threat at that time." He was considered a threat to Mercer, he was favoured to win that fight. He was also considered a threat to Foreman, the odds were close even though he was the underdog.
Just a reminder that you're worshipping a guy who secretly exposed many women to HIV and chose to deny that he had it rather than be a role model like Magic.
I sincerely hope that you're scrutinizing monthly Ring ratings of several other fringe contenders from decades back to advocate for them.
It's pretty gross how much attention such a mediocre man gets. I guess being a knockout puncher in ring as like hitting a home run or a 3 pointer... people will idolize you no matter what you do in your personal life. I bet you people talk about Wilder in 30 years like they do Morrison now. "hOw DaNgeRous wAs WiLDer u guyz!?"