Tommy Morrison vs. Joe Louis

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Apr 12, 2019.

Tommy Morrison vs. Joe Louis

  1. Tommy by KO

    16 vote(s)
    14.3%
  2. Tommy by Dec.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Joe by KO

    95 vote(s)
    84.8%
  4. Joe by Dec.

    1 vote(s)
    0.9%
  1. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,603
    452
    Feb 4, 2021
    thats deontay his tech always was trash and thats from this era

    the 90s era which tom was in was way better tech and moved better

    yea they are wrong those dudes were talking on a louis from his own time how could they not be outdated if it was boxers sense then with way better upper and lower body movement your not updated with the time

    why would you think that louis wasnt outdated when you can watch video and see how he was and no big name 70s-90s boxer would lose then cause of advances in movement that shows that era louis was in is outdated

    unless you think people from 70-90s would lose which no big/ middle carder from those years would lose to anybody from louis era

    you so stuck into thinking that people words mean something your not using logic
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2021
  2. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,603
    452
    Feb 4, 2021
    isn't that another quote I used but used it as the 70s-90s boxers would go undefeated in that time
     
    White Bomber likes this.
  3. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,603
    452
    Feb 4, 2021
    jersey is the most skilled I said that mutiple times he is the best mover in the whole black and white era before ali
     
    White Bomber likes this.
  4. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,603
    452
    Feb 4, 2021
    facts buddy simple as that I told buddy cross that to why does he need to be tech when the person he is facing is way outdated

    it's like a beginner in their with a trainer the trainer is teaching everything
     
  5. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,603
    452
    Feb 4, 2021
    I said that before to but used it as it only worked cause they stood in front of their opponent
     
    White Bomber likes this.
  6. White Bomber

    White Bomber Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,046
    1,273
    Mar 31, 2021
    Morrison can more than replicate what Louis did.
     
    moneytheman12 likes this.
  7. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,603
    452
    Feb 4, 2021
    if tom wanted to why couldnt he run through a gauntlet

    Louis would always lose in his time to certain dudes tom never would
     
  8. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist Full Member

    15,959
    8,258
    Apr 3, 2012
    His dumbass didn't even run through the Michael Bentt gauntlet.
     
  9. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,243
    4,848
    Oct 22, 2015
    I agree with most of this. He was protected, and got a lot of press
    because of his complexion. But he did have ability, and that left hook
    was fast and fierce. Louis would need to be well aware of it. Not
    sleepwalking like he was against Galento.
     
    Bukkake likes this.
  10. Stiches Yarn

    Stiches Yarn Active Member Full Member

    1,074
    1,609
    Jan 2, 2021
    Well we are talkin about joe louis, not his opponents, and that doesn't change the fact the brown bomber was a fantastic technical boxers; has an advanced defenses, and formidable offenses stylistically as boxer-punchers; known for great jab and his deadly counter. He possessed incredible punching power, and a one-hitter quitter; he could bang with his hook, a boxing expert like Floyd Patterson in The International Boxing Hall of Fame's Basic Boxing Skills wrote that Louis had the sweetest left hook he ever saw.
    Actually, people words, boxing experts words to be more precise mean A LOT than the word of a random guy like you who just saw 15 seconds of a random fight and then goes on to judge the fighter's performances like he truly knows what he is talkin about.
    And once again, in almost every single boxing expert i am aware of, Joe Louis has one of the best foundamentals of all time, and NO fighter from the 1970's and the 1990's could match him in this department. Technicians like Larry Holmes, Lennox Lewis, sonny liston were probably good enough to be ranked behind Joe Louis when it comes to talk about skills, and maybe only the great ezzard charles could surpass him.
    But Tommy was certainely not a better technical boxer than Joe.
    YOUR the one who is not using logic.
     
    kaapa2 and Marvelous Mauler like this.
  11. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,603
    452
    Feb 4, 2021
    louis was one of the best for his time and before that doesn't make him overcome the future how am I not using logic when it's all I use

    louis cant be as great as your acting like cause else he wouldnt have been beat him a era which no other 70s-90s would have been beat by that shows a flaw in your words from people

    i never can be found saying something like words said by another man means something cause it doesnt

    and no words mean anything cause those people you talk of are not gods which mean their words can be wrong like anybody else
    unless you wanna say they were gods when they wasnt

    I can show mutiple vids of people moving way more advanced then louis and that whole era

    experts didnt need to show me vid proof I can see can you cause it seems like viewing doesn't matter only words matter to you

    their words mean more then a random guy a dumb quote you seen others use and thought it would work with me quotes dont work with me

    so do we have you keep being stuck in time thinking words matter or do I have to post vids breaking down each advancement in movement which Louis and the whole era lacked which I am undefeated in vid proof

    I already know im right I only responded cause I like to tell you people the truth
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2021
  12. janitor

    janitor Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    66,903
    17,034
    Feb 15, 2006
    I have to seriously question that.

    The most obvious problem is that Morrison was only preforming anything like at world level for 4-5 years, while Louis was doing it for fifteen years.

    That if nothing else blasts a massive hole in your assertion.

    The other problem is that Morrison was not anything like consistent against elite opposition.

    If you are not beating guys like Bentt or Purity, then it would be a brave man who backed you to beat men like Baer, and Walcott, especially if you were fighting them a decade apart, sometimes while well past your own prime.

    Frankly I wouldn't bet on him beating men like Galento, or Pastor.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  13. Stiches Yarn

    Stiches Yarn Active Member Full Member

    1,074
    1,609
    Jan 2, 2021
    Anything can happen in an infinite universe.
    That said, the chance of these boxing experts bringing up wrong facts is less than I will be called by the College of Cardinals to be the next Pope…
     
  14. Stiches Yarn

    Stiches Yarn Active Member Full Member

    1,074
    1,609
    Jan 2, 2021
    Of course they need to show you them vid proofs, they know their boxing more than you do, but i what i am trying to say is do i really have to trust a random boxing fan when it comes to talk about actual facts instead of a real boxing expert?
    This is not a million dollar question, you can answer it yourself.
     
  15. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,000
    7,260
    May 30, 2019
    Then show it, wouldn't it be easy?
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.