he might yet if he didn't wear a condom with them. what a bout tommy gun vs Apollo creed? that's what this is about. rip tommy. and always wear one.
Maybe if something was wrong with Ali but personally I see Ali never being hit by a punch Morrison threw. The only way I believe Morrison would win is if Morrison had his best fight ever against an unmotivated, unprepared Ali who never bothered to train for the fight.
you need to learn the difference between past tenses and the present tense. 'Has been' is a reference to a past period. If English is not your first language you have some kind of excuse. If you English is fine, then you are replying facetiously, so don't bother. not married.
'has been' refers to the past. I take it from this that it may be an English Language problem for you.
Oh look its the guy who believes Tua would demolish Holyfield atsch Its funny because the best fighter Tommy ever fought was one Lennox Lewis, Lewis has stated numerous times that he compares himself to Muhammad Ali. Now why would a guy who wiped the floor with your hero, compare himself to a fighter like Ali? Foreman says Ali is the greatest of all time, so has Holmes, so has Tyson, so has Lewis, so has Holyfield. Vitali, at the end of the Chisora fight goaded Haye and told him if he wants this belt which has been held by great fighters like Ali, Lewis and Tyson, then come get it. Wladmir Klitsckho did a whole entrance dedicated to Ali. But nope, you know better than all these guys. At least Morrison can smile in his grave due to the moronic purpose of this thread, so all is not in vain.
Allowing for your language problems, here is an explanation - I HAVE BEEN telling you that you are wrong in previous posts. I AM NOW now telling you in this post that you are wrong. Now, I did not just now type my previous posts - I typed them back in the past. But this post is being typed NOW. there is a difference in the time frames they are typed in. therefore, me writing 'HW boxing HAS BEEN dominated by ...' refers to a past time period. it might be the 17th century, the 20th or 21BC. But it is the past. And it is true for the past history of boxing overall, from Johnson through to Tyson, a majority. now you see the difference. you see, I am not a cruel person, I like to educate you.
Isnt there someway you could do an intelligence test on all prospective new members? You wouldn't get insane posts like this one then
Its just too much of a coincidence when multiple alts turn up with a low number of posts, spouting the exact same thing and have the exact same opinions on the exact same fighters. Elroy, Jon Saxon, Papillion, Aquamarine, Joshpage, Foxy01, SKS1943 And its even more of a coincidence that all of these seem to be Pro eastern european and very Anti black, Anti USA. All of their threads constantly bring down past greats, mainly Ali and consantly suck Klitscko dick like its going out of fashion. Too much of a coincidence to me. We can see the game your playing
Well fair enough you're one guy.Still clueless but only one guy. Congratulations on not being 20 guys who are clueless.
The topic was HW boxing. Sorry if that's an issue for you, but I cant change the topic just for your benefit. it is the majority. We could quit the truth but why does this truth in which skin colour is just an irrelevance to ME, bother YOU so much? both this and 'boxing has been dominated...' both refer to the past. Your phrase is a subset of mine, just a more specific one. If you don't like that they share the same meaning, I cant help you. no reason to bring Joe C into this, except for you being you.