A recent poll on the internet had sugar ray robinson as virtually a unanimous number 1 all time welterweight king and Tommy Ryan well outside the top 10. So i thought i would do a bit of a comparison of welterweight records to see how far apart these welterweigt greats really are in terms of legacy. Ryans record is largely incomplete and no one has seen film so it is unfair to make subjective head to head calls, but these are basic facts which are indisputable. Figures are a bit of a rough count. welterweight champion: Fighting record as a welterweight Years fought as a contender - Ryan - 7 Robinson - 6 Fights as a welter: Ryan - 70 fights 45 KOs Losses 1 His only loss was to Charles kid McCoy. who is an all time great Light Heavyweight. Robinson 100 fights 65 KOs Losses 1 His only loss was to Jake Lamotta who was an all time great middleweight. Championship reign as welterweight: Ryan - 4yrs Robinson No of successful title defences: Ryan - 9 Robinson -4 Fights won as welterweight champion: Ryan 28 Robinson 23 I will compare middleweight records when i get time, but i wait with interest for someone to explain why robinson is so much better.
Ryan was a reat welterweight and middleweight champion who dominated an era inhabited by other pound for pound greats. In that respect he is somewhat like the two Sugar Rays. Before Robinsons career many would have rated Ryan as the greatest welterweight of all time. Ryans main problem is that he has been forgotten. If people could put one foot in his era and the other in Robinson's or Leonards we would see him coming out as a top 5 all time welter on a lot of lists.
i have just been on ebay and amazon and could find no books about tommy ryan so perhaps that backs up janitors point about him being forgotten
Ryan isn't forgotten but a lot of his opponents seem to be. He definitely needs a second and third look for this reason.
I did a rough count off of Cyberboxingzone. They may be a couple of fights wrong because counting is harder than it sounds for someone like me.
I must say its a little hard to definitively say he was a welterweight for all that time..There was a good chance he fought a fair few fights around the lightweight limit as a wee lad. Between the clearly incomplete boxrec entry and the cyber boxing jumble I always considered him more of a middleweight..though he does seem to have the better top shelf wins at 147.
I think you are correct, in fact i am certain of it. Ray may have been better than Tommy Ryan, but the reality is that most people simply dont know Ryan. And looking at what both actually achieved, they are pretty much exactly the same in nearly all facets. If anything, Ryan may have a slight advantage. When i get time, it will be interesting to compare their middleweight careers, because i tend to think that Ryan might actually have a slightly better middleweight record, but i am not sure. One of the things which does hurt Ryans case a little is the scoring of bouts. For obvious reasons, Ryan has quite a few draws and NCs. But Ray would have also quite a few too, if similar scoring and rules were in effect. Also, quite a few of Ryan's KOs were in fights much longer than Rays fights, but this is again balanced by some fights being scheduled for only 4 rounds. All in all, i think that these two records are so close on any objective viewing that i think it is quite silly to suggest that it is even posible to list 10 fighters in between them. I think that these two guys must rate very, very close to each other in any list ever done, pound for pound or otherwise, so if Ray is ranked 1, i think it near impossible to have Tommy any lower than 5. And in reality, they probably need to be ranked right next to each other.
Probably, let me count the cheating way. Dempsey, billy smithx2, tracey, Jack Bonner X 2, Jack Moffatt Is 7 correct or did i miss again?
Everybody here will have heard of Mysterious Billy Smith but they might not know that a minority regatrded him as the GOAT at welterweight even going into the 30s. Tommy West as you know split series with the fab three of his era (Smith, Ryan and Walcott). Fighters like George Green and Frank Craig are largley forgotten today with fragmentary records but at the time they were seen as elite level fighters.
I think that the most he could claim is: 5 defences of the welterweight title and 9 defences of the middleweight title. If you wanted to be on safe ground you would say 4 defences of the welterweight title and 8 of the middleweight title.
I had four defences at ww. But you inspired me Boilermaker, I think i'll make Ryan the fighter I have a second look at this or next week, see what I can't dig up.
This acount of the fight between Joe Walcott and George Green gives an idea of Green's contemporary standing. Consider that the average fan looking at boxrec today would assume that Green was a journeyman. This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected