Toney is (or rather was) more skilled. I understand some people thinking Hopkins was better overall although I don't agree. What Hopkins has over Toney though, which some people wouldn't think of as a positive, is that he's willing to fight very negatively and endure a few boos in order to win. Toney would never do that, although he's not a big puncher, I get the impression he's always looking for the stoppage whether he gets it or not. Another thing worth considering is that Toney doesn't foul much whereas for Hopkins fouling is in itself a skillset.
I respect Toney more, for reasons I can't be bothered going into, though I have enormous respect for both of them. I don't really like pitting these two against each other in threads, I love them both!
And Hopkins wasn't? Watch Trinidad-Joppy, then watch Hopkins-Trinidad. Hopkins-Trinidad is the most skilled performance of the 2000s IMO.
What the ****? This is how you answer me saying 'nothing against hopkins' You dumb mother ****er, I know who hopkins is and how good he was, get the **** out of here.
I think some of you are so enamored with Toney's subtle skills. Yeah, they are amazing but Hopkins can beat you inside/outside, control range and dictate the fight. He can fight more styles. There really isn't anything Hopkins can't do as a fighter. Technically, he's a textbook. So what if he had to work towards perfecting his skills? To me, that's more impressive.
Read your own post dick. You said "Toney was other worldly". And I'm saying "And Hopkins wasn't?" What part of that is giving you trouble exactly? Seems pretty ****ing simple from here. Your statement clearly insinuates that Toney was on a different level to Hopkins, which is untrue.
The "he learned his skills" thing doesn't really interest me, I don't care where either man got their skills from or whatever, for me the part in red is the key point in Hopkins's favour. It is this which makes this a close-run thing.
No, he was not as skilled as Toney. That is my OPINION that I EXPRESSED when the thread starter ASKED the QUESTION. Now, I understand your user name is Popkins, and you would love to hear a bunch of idolatrous bull****, but I am not as impressed with Hopkins as you are. Sorry this burns you so deeply, but it's a fact that will never change.
Do you guys think Toney could slow down the work rate of a guy like Calzaghe the way Hopkins did? I doubt it. Maybe if he keeps countering beautifully he will but Toney just doesn't have the footwork to control the distance and pace of a fight like Hopkins.
Damn, tough call.... Two totally different types of skill, both carried them a long way. I can't call it, Hopkins for sure had more discipline, is the greater fighter in my opinion. But Toney was special as well, had more natural talent than B.Hop did, and was successful at more weight classes. I would have loved to see a prime Toney vs. prime Hopkins at MW or SMW... It would have been a good tactical fight.
Please don't project your own childish mindset on me. See my first post on this thread, then you can apologize for your infantile failure.
1994 James Toney outclasses Joe Calzaghe every bit as clearly as 2001 Bernard Hopkins would do. Both men were of a far higher skill level than Joe C.