Toney vs Harrison (In Talks)

And he stopped Danny, Booker, and wait...****....

And Peter stopped McCline, Shufford, and ****....nevermind.

Same stuff over and over. I work on facts and common sense. You go by interviews and hearsay.

 

You cherry pick facts, and attempt to explain away others that don't suit your purpose, or just ignore them entirely...like what you did in this quote.

Ignore all the stoppage victories, and act like anyone who acknowledges them, or even worse gives value to them is blind.

You are blind.

 

I thought Toney vs Haye is in talks, if this one is on then I'll pick Harrison to win, Toney is just too shot and lacks serious power to trouble Harrison in my opinion.

 

Okay, other than Holyfield, who did Toney stop?

Okay, other than Oleg, who did Peter stop?

Once again, you just don't get it. :hi:

You can't win...I own you because I base everything on facts and analysis.

 

I've seen you post specifically in the past, about how stupid the posters who claim to own someone are...and here you go.

You having to say "other than," is you blindly ignoring and disregarding a fact that doesn't suit you.

...this is the internet...it's pwned.

 

Thank you for proving my point.

One ko (which is generous in Toney's case) in double digit heavyweight fights suggest he is highly feather fisted. This is obvious, yet you dont' get it.

Peter has one ko once he stepped up.

So again, these are facts and can't be disputed. You are my *****. I let you go but you just had to challenge me again. I will give you another chance to not ever address me again.

 

You are a homo and are in love with me...how many post back were you supposedly "done with me...???"

Yet you keep coming back to daddy. :yep

You were factually destroyed, and still do not admit that the actual stoppages scored prove power...your blind nuthuggin' ass is stuck on the bouts that did not result in stoppage...yet you have to use his one stoppage as "evidence" of no power. All a stoppage victory is evidence of, is power...it does not prove a lack of power in other bouts.

You don't get it. You don't get anything that you can't digest ******* first and balls deep.

 

I'm still waiting for some source or something to suggest this isn't bull****. Until then this is just an internet rumour.

This argument that you two geeks are having is irrelevant becauuse THIS FIGHT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!!

 

Toney won't be able to KO him ( I don't think) but even at 40, Toney will box his ears off in am embarrassingly one sided fight.

 

You got damned homo...

...contribute or f*ck off...


Here...it's about the 6th article from the top at "the scene" right now.

 

If this fight comes off, instead of a Toney vs. Haye clash, it will be a huge disappointment for boxing fans. I mean what's the point in fighting Audley at this point??? Time is running out for Toney, he needs to fight top ranked contenders asap in order to reposition himself for a title shot. If he absolutely wants to fight in England, Toney should have fought Harrison much ealier, say in September, immediately after his Rahman fight which was really a non effort for Toney. That would have been a wise move by Goosen in order to put even more pressure on Haye.

 

If Toney doesn't completely outwork and counter him, I'll eat my hat. And I don't even have a hat, I'd go out and willingly spend money to buy one just to eat it.

Audley should be the kind of heavyweight Toney loves to fight. Zero inside game, not busy, leans his head down in the clinch and backs away in straight lines. Lovely.

 

I thought Haye already Toney out.

Why the **** would you want to see Toney throw away the last few braincells he's got?

He should retire or have a few fights against nothing opposition like Harrison and retire on a win. he's never getting a HW belt.

 

Agreed, Dan is not putting the right moves together. I guess we will just have to wait and hope...

 

That's a bold pick. I favor Toney who looked good against Raahman.