Well it's pretty well established that he schooled Camacho in training. Emanuel Steward and Gavin Evans said it, and you're just going to disbelieve it
Everyone says schools Camacho in sparring, and you're going to assume the exact opposite and just assume Camacho actually schooled him? I see your assumption as a bit further off.
McGirt was very slick and smooth in his day, with a good punch and good speed. And he was most certainly not a "come forward mexican pressure fighter".
To be fair to Brownpimp, he does have some hard evidence for it: Redrooster remembers reading it somewhere in some magazine whilst no longer remembering in which magazine it was in
i said 85% of his opponents, not all. Like i said before, you still havent told me a style that would guarantee a win over whitaker, your dodging the question pal.
You never asked a question, at all, so don't lie, first of all. At LW, what style would beat Whitaker? What style or what fighter? I'm sure I could think of a style that noone had, but as far as a fighter? At LW? You could make a few suggestions, but as I've said over and over, I would favor none of them.
jorge paez azumah nelson joe luis ramirez julio cesar vazquez julio cesar chavez policarpo diaz santos cardona greg haugen wilfredo rivera rapeal pineda These guys are all come forward pressure fighters and they make up the vast majority of whitaker's main opponents. I dont count the pre-title bums as opponents.
IMO a style that gives Whitaker hell is an extremely fast offensive fighter with great outside boxing ability and footspeed. In a p4p sense I say SRL or Robinson would be stylistic nightmares for Whitaker although Sweat Pea disagrees with me.
let him disagree, hes a nuthugger. When did whitaker fight anyone that resembles leonard or even another defensive master like a locce, or benitez. He picks whitaker to beat robinson p4p, lol. Does he honestly think pernell is the best of all times, lol.
Well by watching Pernell I would say he's one of the best ever. Honestly a brilliant defensive boxer with mastery of all ranges of fighting and probably the best boxer ever off the back foot but personally I see a Leonard or a Robinson as being all wrong for him stylistically.
Me and werety already had this convo. Unlike you, I actually had good, well thought out arguments for Whitaker. And I wasn't saying Whitaker beats Robinson at 147 either by the way, I was saying the Lightweight version of Whitaker vs the Welterweight version of Robinson, P4P I'd take Whitaker slightly, though perhaps taking Robinson in a rematch. Am I getting into it again? No, because I already put a very good amount of my time into that argument. And no, I think P4P there are fighters that could beat Whitaker.
Greg Haugen was not a come forward pressure fighter you tool.:roll: You don't even know these fighters, therefore don't judge them.
