Carl Thompson was no bum, and was an extremely tough test for a fighter at the stage Haye was at when he fought him.
Don't be silly. Adamek has a very good chance at beating Haye. Either you're a really big Haye fan, or you don't watch much boxing. Adamek is almost certainly a top-ten heavyweight.
Why would you reward stupidity? He was arguing with a guy that was talking about Adamek - so he brings in an embarassing loss to a totally unrelated fighter? Like that is somehow relevant? ****, I know Haye fans are stupid but this is....this..... no wait, I just answered my own question. atsch
adamek beat golota. he ain't in the picture yet. haye will fight ruiz probably. then one of the klitschko's i'd suspect. not on the radar. :nono
Haye to me looked very average tonight against a guy an old Holyfield practically beat. If you are comparing Valuev's boxing skills to Klitschko, then you're the dumb one my friend. Klitschko would connect a lot more than Valuev. Give me a break
first off....the klits dont "brutally knock out anyone" if you havent noticed, they wear people down and take them out after 9,10 rds lets not get carried away.....brutally is what angulo did tonight....you have to be aggressive like that, to get a KO like that
Here we go again .. people with backwards logic cause of their stupid bias. Adamek vs Haye would be an amazing, very even fight.. stfu, please.
Hey Pacquiao lost to Singsurat? Now who the **** is that!? Everyone loses my friend. It's how you come back from a loss and better your mistakes.
I picked Haye to beat Valuev, I just thought he would bring something exciting to the fight like he was raving about for 3 months beforehand and I was not impressed at all. He fought one of the weakest heavyweight champions of all time and looked average at best.