Tony Galento v David Tua 15rds?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Aug 25, 2016.


  1. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,707
    1,660
    Jul 8, 2010
    Then you're not questioning anything that has any basis in reality.
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,219
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,219
    Feb 15, 2006
    Would you pick Mac Foster over anybody who went toe to toe with him?
     
  4. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,707
    1,660
    Jul 8, 2010
    No, and I wouldn't pick Tua against anyone who went toe to toe with him. I'd sure as hell pick him against Galento though.
     
  5. KernowWarrior

    KernowWarrior Bob Fitzsimmons much bigger brother. Full Member

    3,151
    3,480
    Jul 12, 2012
    Depends in what era, if fighting in Galentos era where oversights of that nice Mr Queensberrys rule were less frowned upon then Tony wins.
    “Who is this guy, Queensberry? I don’t see anything wrong in sticking your thumb into a guy’s eye. Just a little. - Tony Galento.

    Bring the fight into the recent present, with the rules being more robustly followed, then Tua gets the win.

    If the match up could have been made, then the likers of a toe to toe slugfest would have been well catered for.
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
     
  8. Mod-Mania

    Mod-Mania Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,705
    2,881
    Aug 12, 2012
    Although Tua is ridiculously overrated on here, he'd beat Galento.
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,219
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,517
    46,079
    Feb 11, 2005
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,219
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  12. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    If you are smart just follow the path of least resistance to reach the top. You can do that the last 30 years in boxing. Could not do so prior. Just look at George Foreman. An ATG for sure and top five in my book but he was able to use the system to do his best to avoid those with the best chance of beating him eventually finding a weak "champion" to fight. Incredible for him that the weak champion was the true champion at that time.
     
  13. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,707
    1,660
    Jul 8, 2010
    Resumes don't win fights, even assuming Galento's was superior (it wasn't).

    Tua fought in a tougher era, fought bigger and more resilient fighters and proved himself as one of the most dangerous knockout punchers in the division. His limitations wouldn't be a factor here. He'd have no problems finding the slow, ludicrously amateurish Galento and cracking his jaw. Given the gloves of the 1930s he'd probably kill him.
     
  14. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    :deal Bottom line.
     
  15. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Not true. The 1930s heavyweight rankings had plenty of very undistinguished guys (some w/ plenty of losses and draws) who were only (briefly) ranked because they knocked off someone who was only briefly ranked because he knocked off someone...

    And head to head, the group of men Tua beat in '96 to snag his first year-end Ring ranking is a far more formidable group than that which most 1930s heavyweights faced en route to their rankings.