Tony Mundine vs. Tony Sibson

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dpw417, Nov 27, 2008.


Page 3 of 3
  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,262
    49,633
    Apr 27, 2005
    I disagree. He still would have had to beat a Briscoe or Valdez and history shows us Briscoe ko'ed Tony the same year as Monzon. Briscoe actually beat Mundine before Monzon did 8 months later. The roll of the dice would have REALLY had to fall Tony's way for this to happen.
     
    JohnThomas1, Dec 2, 2008
    JohnThomas1, Dec 2, 2008
    #31
  2. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,813
    848
    Jul 25, 2008
    Yes, but today there are more than 1 or 2 titles about. I don't even think you've got to be a world class fighter to win half of them.
     
    AlFrancis, Dec 2, 2008
    AlFrancis, Dec 2, 2008
    #32
  3. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    EDIT: nevermind!!
     
    GazOC, Dec 2, 2008
    GazOC, Dec 2, 2008
    #33
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,262
    49,633
    Apr 27, 2005
    :huh

     
    JohnThomas1, Dec 2, 2008
    JohnThomas1, Dec 2, 2008
    #34
  5. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,813
    848
    Jul 25, 2008
    I do apologise. I agree, It wasn't just because of Monzon that Mundine wouldn't have won a title in his own time. I was actually referring to the bit about today which of course you weren't disagreeing with.
    Does that make sense?
     
    AlFrancis, Dec 3, 2008
    AlFrancis, Dec 3, 2008
    #35
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,262
    49,633
    Apr 27, 2005

    We're on the same wave now mate. Cheers. I knew what phrase you were talking about but wanted to show you where i was coming from as i knew you might have missed it.
     
    JohnThomas1, Dec 4, 2008
    JohnThomas1, Dec 4, 2008
    #36
Page 3 of 3