Tony Tucker vs Michael Spinks 1987

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by superman1986, Aug 27, 2017.


Page 1 of 2
  1. superman1986

    superman1986 Active Member banned Full Member

    747
    383
    Jul 4, 2017
    Its said that Spinks ducked Tucker, but I don't think thats totally accurate. I think its more the case of Spinks gettin 4 million dollars as opposed to the half a million he would've gotten for Tucker.

    Although in hindsight, had he taken on Tucker and won, it may not have bern good for his bank balance, but better for his legacy at heavy.

    Who takes it between an ATG light heavy and a solid, formidable heavyweight contender?
     
    superman1986, Aug 27, 2017
    superman1986, Aug 27, 2017
    #1
  2. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,567
    Jan 30, 2014
    Tucker would've exploited his size and reach advantage and won a low-action UD.
     
    mrkoolkevin, Aug 27, 2017
    mrkoolkevin, Aug 27, 2017
    #2
    lloydturnip, Pat M and SluggerBrawler like this.
  3. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,527
    Apr 26, 2015
    Tucker would not beat Spinks. Spinks speed, elusiveness and jab wins this over the distance.
     
    Perry, Aug 27, 2017
    Perry, Aug 27, 2017
    #3
    Bonecrusher and superman1986 like this.
  4. superman1986

    superman1986 Active Member banned Full Member

    747
    383
    Jul 4, 2017
    My thoughts exactly
     
    superman1986, Aug 27, 2017
    superman1986, Aug 27, 2017
    #4
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,610
    28,866
    Jun 2, 2006
    Tucker for me.
     
    mcvey, Aug 28, 2017
    mcvey, Aug 28, 2017
    #5
    heerko koois and Pat M like this.
  6. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,494
    3,075
    Feb 17, 2008
    I really don't see Spinks doing well here. His legs had deteriorated quite a bit by this time and he'd need them against a safety first tall guy with a big reach advantage. Whatever else he was, Spinks was no risk taker in there and he'd be within punching range long before he could set his own feet. And Tony is no risk taker himself and will not put himself in harm's way.

    Dreary bout though and a decision bout all the way. I think Carl Williams at that time was another real bad match for Spinks. Mike had to have face first easy to hit guys or diminished reflexes in front of him as a heavy. Tucker at that time was not that kind of opponent.
     
    zadfrak, Aug 28, 2017
    zadfrak, Aug 28, 2017
    #6
    lloydturnip, Seamus and mcvey like this.
  7. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,567
    Jan 30, 2014
    I agree with all of this.
     
    mrkoolkevin, Aug 28, 2017
    mrkoolkevin, Aug 28, 2017
    #7
  8. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,104
    16,992
    Apr 3, 2012
    I pretty much agree with Perry on this.
     
    NoNeck, Aug 28, 2017
    NoNeck, Aug 28, 2017
    #8
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,509
    27,051
    Feb 15, 2006
    This fight interests me, because it could have been, and it could have taken history in a very different direction.
     
    janitor, Aug 28, 2017
    janitor, Aug 28, 2017
    #9
    lloydturnip and superman1986 like this.
  10. superman1986

    superman1986 Active Member banned Full Member

    747
    383
    Jul 4, 2017
    I think the public wanted Cooney/Spinks more. Hence the bigger purse. Tucker was really unknown by anyone who didn't really follow the sport. More hardcore fans may have wanted Tucker/Spinks but John Q Public wanted Cooney/Spinks

    I remember hearing that right before the Tyson/Tucker fight someone saw Tucker in public and asked him if he was still fighting.
     
    superman1986, Aug 28, 2017
    superman1986, Aug 28, 2017
    #10
  11. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,013
    17,474
    Apr 26, 2006
    I,m going with Tucker...late round tko
     
    heerko koois, Aug 28, 2017
    heerko koois, Aug 28, 2017
    #11
  12. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,013
    17,474
    Apr 26, 2006
    My top 5 of the heavyweights ( 1980-1989 )
    1-Tyson
    2-Holmes
    3-Tucker
    4-Whitherspoon
    5- P Thomas
     
    heerko koois, Aug 28, 2017
    heerko koois, Aug 28, 2017
    #12
  13. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,677
    2,556
    Oct 18, 2004
    What happened when Michael sparred Greg would happen if he fought Tony. He would lose by wide unanimous decision.
     
    Titan1, Aug 28, 2017
    Titan1, Aug 28, 2017
    #13
  14. superman1986

    superman1986 Active Member banned Full Member

    747
    383
    Jul 4, 2017
    Michael Spinks sparred Greg Page???
     
    superman1986, Aug 28, 2017
    superman1986, Aug 28, 2017
    #14
  15. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,677
    2,556
    Oct 18, 2004
    Yeah, JT mentioned it a couple of times.
     
    Titan1, Aug 28, 2017
    Titan1, Aug 28, 2017
    #15
Page 1 of 2