Tony Tucker vs Michael Spinks in 1987 who wins?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Jamzy ⭐, Oct 10, 2018.


  1. Jamzy ⭐

    Jamzy ⭐ Active Member Full Member

    1,468
    957
    Oct 8, 2018
    As we know back in 1987 Spinks refused to fight number-1 ranked contender Tony Tucker and was stripped of his title after he opted to instead fight Gerry Coney.

    Who do you think would win this fight between two champions of the 1980 heavyweight era?
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,589
    27,253
    Feb 15, 2006
    Shame that it never happened, either way!
     
    Positive energy and Jamzy ⭐ like this.
  3. ideafix12

    ideafix12 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,011
    863
    Jul 30, 2010
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
  5. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,274
    15,342
    Jun 9, 2007
    Spinks. Tired of hearing what Tucker could have been. Well he wasnt anything special in my book.
    Spinks UD
     
  6. jont

    jont Active Member Full Member

    1,118
    340
    Sep 27, 2004
    Spinks is not going to win this fight..... tucker was mobile... long jab and would eventually make Spinks a bit tentative.. shot knees don't just apply to his loss to Tyson... these same knees have to face Tucker...
     
  7. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,105
    15,584
    Dec 20, 2006
  8. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,271
    7,014
    Nov 22, 2014
    Tucker would've easily knocked out Spinks in 87. Spinks was shot with two bad knees by 87. Spinks in 1985 would've had a chance of maybe outpointing Tucker, but even then Tucker most likely would still win, since Holmes in 1985 wasn't half the fighter he was in 82 or 83.
     
    Greg Price99 and Jamzy ⭐ like this.
  9. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,691
    2,566
    Oct 18, 2004
    Tucker UD or late round stoppage.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  10. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,686
    17,742
    Apr 3, 2012
    If Tucker could barely decision Norris, he wouldn't beat Spinks.
     
  11. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,513
    3,112
    Feb 17, 2008
    Spinks was ready to be taken. He drops a lopsided decision to Tucker. I'm not certain Spinks even gets by Bruno back then--especially if Mike Spinks was going to be a road warrior.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  12. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,985
    19,028
    Oct 4, 2016
    I'm not a fan of Spinks at heavyweight, Tucker
     
  13. jont

    jont Active Member Full Member

    1,118
    340
    Sep 27, 2004
    Norris is one of my favorite fighters and was a very skilled one.. Tucker was nowhere near his best at this point when he fought Orlin... Spinks was just not going to be able to fight a younger fighter with good reflexes compared to a faded Holmes and ancient Cooney... I actually would love to see Spinks and Orlin fight each other... that would be a much more intriguing match up than the OP
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  14. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,686
    17,742
    Apr 3, 2012
    Tucker did almost nothing during those supposed prime years.
     
    rinsj, George Crowcroft and ideafix12 like this.
  15. jont

    jont Active Member Full Member

    1,118
    340
    Sep 27, 2004
    I agree he had few competitive fights and not a great performance but he had lost a large degree of his mobility and spark when he came back.. Spinks just was not that great of a heavyweight in my opinion. Tucker is one of those fighters whose reputation is based on potential compared to real accomplishments...