It’s all subjective isn’t it. What Manny did was great. But he didn’t fight the same calibre of guys that Duran did. IMHO, Floyd doesn’t hold a great win over Manny.
No way pac is number 2, he didn't get the better of Marquez and he lose to floyd. If he was the better man at the end of that Marquez chapter despite losing to floyd then perhaps a top 10. His career is not over though, in his latest interview he said he would like to face errol and bud, if he could win against both then thats another story.
I'm not judging Dixon on a few seconds clip. It was a few minutes. I saw him throw many punches, a lot of which were telegraphed or off balanced. As far as today's fighters go, the first time I saw Loma, Pac, Barrera, Marquez, Floyd, Golovkin, it only took a few moments to see they had good technique. Dixon, terrible technique.
If winning belts in different divisions is your criteria then I guess you have FLoyd and Oscar above SRR.
You're taking it out of context. Its not the only criteria, the poster who i was originally conversing with was suggesting that none of that matters. To be in the ATG convo, a fighter must have done something exemplary and something that is special. To suggest that what manny has done is not within those parameters is utterly ludicrous.