Top 10 by Decade - Divisional Ranking Experiment

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Mar 19, 2018.


  1. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,821
    20,258
    Apr 3, 2012
    Gomez put up big numbers between 95 and 2005
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  2. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    50,007
    17,480
    Jul 19, 2004
    I meant to reply to this when I first saw it the other day. As soon as I saw the name "Archie Moore" - before I even read what you'd wrote, it immediately struck me he has Louis beat. Good call. And outstanding observations all around. I wish I had thought of some of this when I was doing the episode.

    As far as your first point, regarding guys over 50, I think it's really just dependent on how many guys have 5 or more years being perceived as a top 10 guy. This system is a zero sum game. Every decade, there are 550 total points to be allocated, where no single fighter can ever mathematically score more than 100. So I think the decades, like the 1950s, where Marciano topped the list with 48 - was mostly a matter of no heavyweight from that specific period (1950-59) ranked consistently throughout the decade. And that plays into what @The Long Count said regarding guys like Grant and Witherspoon sneaking into the 90s Top 10, in the only heavyweight decade that had 4 or more 50 point heavyweights. The bottom lot sneaking in with low scores, makes sense when you have 4 guys scoring 50 or more in a 0 sum game, especially with Lewis and Holyfield both topping 70 (something I should have noted in itself, as in terms of what this scoring criteria is producing, that's unique thus far).

    And you make some fair points on Patterson, especially with what you said regarding the 1950s. But I still think it's interesting - that even into the early 70s, he was viewed among the 10 best competing in the marquee weight class, often viewed in the upper half of those ratings.

    Wlad's longevity is more of a "proven" longevity, like Louis and Ali and Holmes. They all had longevity not just near the top, but usually AT the top. And I truly do believe Wlad is likely to be more fondly appreciated as time passes forward.

    I'm curious if you could elaborate on Turkey Thompson?
     
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    50,007
    17,480
    Jul 19, 2004
    In this instance, I don't think it would have changed things a whole lot (in terms of the final list). Joe Louis would have had a few more points, but not enough to pass Ali. Patterson and Tyson would have had a few more points, but again, I don't think it would have been enough to really alter those numbers.

    I may go back and do that at some point. Once I have all of the data for every weight class, I have some ideas on using that for future observations and speculation.
     
    BitPlayerVesti likes this.
  4. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    50,007
    17,480
    Jul 19, 2004
    I may have misspoken, but I always try and make a point to say "at the conclusion of such and such a year, these were the top rated boxers according to Ring". So I do TRY and make that point whenever I've utilized Ring's rich archive of rankings.
     
    The Long Count likes this.
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    50,007
    17,480
    Jul 19, 2004
    I would use something else if there was a more objective source with such a rich archive, but as it stands, I'm unaware of any such publication, and I think Ring tends to be far more objective (and dates back further) than current day alphabet bodies.

    Strong point on the 40s - it was something I noted on my older (and since abandoned) ranking experiment, and it will no doubt be a reality for all weight classes in that decade. In the case of Joe Louis, for my 2 cents, I actually think it hurt his long term standing, as I speculate he would have probably racked up more title defenses. In terms of the scoring criteria I used here it wouldn't have made any difference (I don't think). But I know Gus Lesnevich is certainly someone who will have benefited from war time circumstances under the scoring here.
     
    The Long Count likes this.
  6. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    50,007
    17,480
    Jul 19, 2004
    I hadn't thought of it that way, but that's a solid observation with great examples.
     
  7. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    50,007
    17,480
    Jul 19, 2004
    Great stuff, all around. I will reply to this in more depth later.
     
  8. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    50,007
    17,480
    Jul 19, 2004
    I am very curious - which pet theories did it help enforce, and what were the things you overlooked?
     
  9. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    50,007
    17,480
    Jul 19, 2004
    Yeah, he had the Larry Holmes type of timing, where his peak in the weight class stretched across two decades in such a way that he didn't have as high a score as he might have otherwise within a single decade.
     
  10. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,621
    9,227
    Oct 8, 2013
    Mauriello is overrated. And Turkey Thompson is underrated good shouts. Last man to beat Elmer ray before he went on his historic run.

    Someone who totally slips through the cracks and had a pretty outstanding career. Bob Pastor. Absent from both the 30s and 40s list. I guess that happens when you career starts in the middle of one decade and ends early in the next. I’m sure their are plenty of others shortchanged by the start and end point of their career but was surprised he didn’t place anywhere.
     
    edward morbius and Rumsfeld like this.
  11. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    50,007
    17,480
    Jul 19, 2004
    For better or worse, here is Part 3 of the ranking experiment.

    This content is protected
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,721
    30,668
    Jun 2, 2006
    Rummy makes some quality posts.
     
    The Long Count and Rumsfeld like this.
  13. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    475
    Oct 6, 2004
    Archie Moore's dominance is astonishing. It will be great to compare his dominance to Sugar Ray Robinson's when (hopefully) the all time pound for pound lists are done.
     
    The Long Count and Rumsfeld like this.
  14. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,270
    Sep 5, 2011
    Rumsfeld--"I'm curious if you could elaborate on Turkey Thompson."

    Well, I think your system here doesn't underrate him, but puts him at about where he should be. This also indicates that The Ring also did a fair job of rating him during his career.

    My take is that he has been historically underrated and largely forgotten, though more as a puncher perhaps than as a fighter. I think he was the most dangerous heavyweight puncher next to Louis of the 1940's. But he fought tough competition and so his final KO ratio--39 out of 72 fights--doesn't match up to let's say Tommy Gomez who had a much weaker resume. Gomez was a white fighter who fought almost all his bouts in the South at a time when mixed matches weren't allowed. I think Gomez only met two black heavyweights--Walcott and Satterfield, and lost to both of them. But like Cleveland Williams, he has the awesome appearing stats (65 KO's in 87 fights) that look overpowering on the surface.

    But I think at least two men whom your system brings into the top ten were more dangerous punchers--

    Thompson (KO'd Elmer Ray, Lee Q. Murray, Gus Dorazio, Pat Valentino, Al Hart, Eddie Blunt, etc.)

    and Savold (KO'd Lou Nova, Lem Franklin, Johnny Flynn, Eddie Blunt, Nate Bolden, Bruce Woodcoc-, etc.)

    As an overall fighter, Thompson could be out-boxed, and seems generally to have been the type who got you early or began running out of gas. He had Pastor down six times in the first round but let him off the hook and ended up losing. Had he stopped Pastor, or had the ref stepped in, I think Thompson would have today the recognition as a puncher he deserves.

    What impact being a west coast fighter has on Thompson's long-term rep when compared to "New York" fighters is an interesting question.
     
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2018
    The Long Count and Rumsfeld like this.
  15. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,270
    Sep 5, 2011
    Thanks for all the hard work. Comments--

    1--besides Ezzard Charles, another name which jumps out at me (for not being on this list at all) is Billy Conn, the champion in 1939 & 1940 and better for certain than Bettina and Lesnevich. What it comes down to is that many of the best light-heavyweights--Charles, Conn, Spinks, Tunney--moved up into the big money heavyweight class.

    2--Lesnevich--is overrated by this system with its WWII bias, but one could make the case he is somewhat underrated historically. Now he was not good enough to handle Conn (and probably not Charles or Moore) but as the ratings show, it was actually Billy Fox who was his #1 contender when they met in 1947, so perhaps Gus wasn't exactly ducking Charles and Moore. But the LaMotta fix thing interestingly helps Jake's career reputation, but devastates Lesnevich's. Ironic, I think. On Gus, if we subtract the three 10's from 1943 to 1945, he would still be the #1 guy during the decade.

    3--Joey Maxim is screwed on the all-time ratings because he was rated at heavyweight by The Ring during most of the 1940's.

    4--interesting for me in the 1950's is the strong showing of Yolande Pompey. (I personally am happy that Danny Nardico slipped into the top ten)

    5--by far the most underrated light-heavyweight might be Maura Mina, who beat Eddie Cotton twice, as well as Gregorio Peralta and Bob Foster, and a slew of other names at the time. The Ring dropped the ball here, its ratings way too American centered. Beating guys down in Peru simply was not put in the same class as American guys getting hometown decisions up here.

    6--by far the most overrated light-heavyweight is Eddie Cotton, a decent but far from outstanding contender, who manages to end up ahead of almost everyone in the 1960's, including of course Mina who beat him twice.
     
    The Long Count and Rumsfeld like this.