Top 10 fighters of past 30 years from light to middle.

Nothing. I was gone for a few days and thought your screen name had something to do with that idiot domingo, thats all.

 

now that you have put you nuts in a vice spin why pbf is an atg seeing as how he has never defended the 140, 147, 154 titles.
you are truly a joke.

 

I wouldn't have a problem with Hopkins being ahead of Arguello (which is what I have), but I wouldn't have a problem with it the other way around either.

 

Had this been from featherweight to middleweight, I would have Arguello above Hopkins. I feel he did his best work at 126 and 130. But from lightweight up, I tend to lean towards Hopkins.

And I agree with you that Arguello is underrated - he deserves more credit than he gets. I've seen people rank De La Hoya higher than Arguello which is absurd.

 

my nuts are just fine ******:roll: floyd is defending his 147 title this decemeber:yep now how many times did duran defend his 147, 154, and 160 titles that he won.:deal and duran had over 120fights and only 12 title defenses in one weight class..get the **** out of here stupid ******.

 

dumb ass wasn't the second fight with leonard a title defense.

 

its obvious he did have to tell you since you ranked floyd and hopkins below chavez what did chavez, duran, and sweet pea do that was more spectacular or more dominant then what floyd, roy, or hopkins did:deal

 

Sweet Pea successfully defended his titles 15 times (8 at lightweight, 7 at welterweight). At lightweight, he won the WBC, WBA, and IBF belts...did Floyd unify any belts at lightweight or any weight for that matter?

 

you sure are stupid:nut duran lost that fight remember no mas:hi:

duran beat 12-0 davey moore dor the wbc title and then got koed against hearns.

so the history was duran wins 147 title next defense he gets tkoed by ray leonard. four years later duran wins the 154 title and gets koed by duran. not once did duran distinguish himself as the best fighter past 135.

 

Since when did Duran KO himself?:huh

 

He did at 147 when he beat Sugar Ray Leonard. At that time, if I remember correctly, Tommy Hearns had yet to win a belt at 147.

 

since it is clear that your knowledge of boxing is limited, let me explain. a title defense is walking into the ring as the champion. and atempting to defend said title. the outcome decides whether it was a successful or unsuccessful defense.

now tell us how many times has pbf walked into the ring as a champion to defend his belt at 140, 147, or 154.

 

Don't bother. He won't understand a word you just said. Then he will call you a name and claim he owns you.

 

i know, but i am bored, and just feel like seeing what new stupidity comes from his keyboard.

 

hopkins had more title defenses then duran did at 135, so objectively duran did not have a better resume then hopkins based on defenses or victories over ATG fighters.

chavez was 88-0 because of the bums he fought in mexico. chavez was considered p4p for 3 years but was not in the toip ten for the first 9 years of his career. floyds reign as p4p champ has equaled chavez's and he has been considered a top ten p4p fighter for 9 years of his professional career. floyd won 5 titles chavez 3 against very suspect opposition and chavez never beat another ATG in his era:deal

sweet pea was not more domiant then floyd at 147 please list his ko's at that weight besides hurtado they were few and far between. right now I have sweet pea as being behind floyd in career accomplishments based on the simple fact that floyd did what pernell did while remaining undefeated. if sweet pea had moved to 160 and won that title then i could see your argument.