Top 10 Greatest H2H Boxers

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Southpaws, Aug 17, 2014.


  1. Southpaws

    Southpaws Guest

    forget the resumes, records, and achievements. this is just purely based on skill alone.

    my list in order

    Ray Robinson
    Thomas Hearns
    Ray Leonard
    Lennox Lewis
    Muhammad Ali
    Evander Holyfield
    Carlos Monzon
    Floyd Mayweather
    Kid Gavilan
    Willy Pep
     
  2. Meazy-E

    Meazy-E Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    20
    Aug 8, 2012
    Kid gavilan and tommy hearns? Lol
     
  3. pablod

    pablod Active Member Full Member

    788
    14
    Nov 14, 2011
    both had great skill sets
     
  4. Southpaws

    Southpaws Guest

    thank you son
     
  5. Meazy-E

    Meazy-E Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    20
    Aug 8, 2012
    Good skills sets, but both also had plenty of weaknesses. Plenty of boxers who have beaten a wider verity of competition as well as higher level. Saying achievements and resumes are irrelevant destroys majority of the argument for any given fighter being ranked high h2h. And stop calling people "son" south you have already demonstrated being one of the least knowledgable posters on this site, so you should avoid talking down to people.
     
  6. Southpaws

    Southpaws Guest

    what are you talking about son? H2H has nothing to do with achievements or who they've beaten you clown... you can't speculate fighters by who they've beaten because some styles are made for others and some aren't... for example: A fighter beats B fighter but loses to C fighter who lost to B fighter.. you see how that works out? now get off of my threads you clown! :hi:
     
  7. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,993
    12,318
    May 8, 2014
    Evander Holyfield? He was great but too inconsistent to be rated that highly H2H. There are several heavyweights who would beat him.
     
  8. Southpaws

    Southpaws Guest

    fair enough, what's your list son?
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,236
    Feb 15, 2006
    Defined how?
     
  10. Southpaws

    Southpaws Guest

    what?
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,236
    Feb 15, 2006
    This content is protected
     
  12. Southpaws

    Southpaws Guest

    you base this on skills and activity in the ring. it's hard for me to rank someone by who they've beaten because the ABC theory i mentioned earlier comes into play
     
  13. Meazy-E

    Meazy-E Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    20
    Aug 8, 2012
    Shut up you little **** bag. Your have rode Floyd's dick every chance you have gotten and flooded the classic with a bunch of bull****, son. Why don't you try watching a fight for once instead of spewing a bunch of horse****. How can a resume not mean anything when guys have proven to dominate multiple styles of world class fighters, yet guys like kid gavilan has losses to different types throughout his entire career. You don't know **** about boxing and you are a **** poster.
     
  14. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005
    Is this a joke? Mayweather's not even close to being on this list. No Charles, Duran, Foreman, Jones and that's for starters..
     
  15. Southpaws

    Southpaws Guest

    ABC theory applies to resumes you idiot... how the hell do you base speculations on who a fighter has beaten when everyone's style, fundamentals, technique and tactics are completely different? it doesn't make any sense. for example: harry greb and sam langford have beaten more hall of famers than robby but robby is still ranked higher than them on every list.. and why is that? muhammad ali has a weaker resume than sam langford but he's ranked higher than him... and why is that? skill :bbb