How the **** do you determine how skilled a fighter is you **** stain? Are we supposed to determine skill based on how well a guy shadow boxes?
I think the question is like: Who on their best day is the nearest to undefeatable? A few I can think of, SRR obviously, Duran and Tyson. If these lads are operating at peak weight on a good night, you're getting KTFO basically.
technique really doesn't matter much H2H it's more about results, and therefore power plays a much bigger role. Foreman was a H2H monster. Honestly MVC you really are screwing up this site with your damn obsession with Mayweather. You really should get the **** out of here.
Deontay Wilder, Calzaghe, Lopez, Marciano, and Mayweather are the greatest of all time according to south. Competition and quality and prime fighters they beat mean nothing, but nobody has ever been able to match their skill and technique.
1. Walker Smith 2. Cassius Clay 3. Sam Langford 4. Henry Armstrong 5. Joe Louis 6. Jack Johnson 7. Joe Frazier (66 -71 ) 8. Roberto Duran (68 -75) 9. Ray Leonard 10. Money Mayweather
my list 1. Sugar Ray Robinson 2. Willie Pep 3. Roberto Duran 4. Ezzard Charles 5. Sugar Ray Leonard 6. Joe Louis 7. Henry Armstrong 8. Muhammad Ali 9. Pernell Whitaker 10. Jose Napoles
Really ? ODLH or Mayweather in Pernells slot. Jones or Toney for Napoles. Archie Moore for Ezzard Charles ( no disrespect to E.C.) ...
restricted to born from 1940 : Sanchez Carbajal Qawi Tucker Rodrigo Valdez Hagler McCallum Duran James Smith Michael Spinks