I think you overate Marshall a little, but I like seeing him that high, do you know what i mean? It pleases me. Burley probably got the better of Williams in the details but I think he has the better wins at 160. Still, 12 is a nice slot for him. How do you think his win resume stacks up against Tiger's? I doubt there will be many fighters who have matched as many champions as Tiger did full stop.
One has to remember who Lloyd Marshalls management was. In some of his earlier losses, he was forced to wear the cuffs. Marshall got himself into the wrong hands early. Luckily it did not affect himm too much. Marshall was an amazing talent.
Everything i've read about Marshall indicates you are quite right. I've read that Marshall went to England in order to escape these cuffs. The gym rats in England raved about him like he was the best they'd ever seen. He was adored there. I might try and dig out some quotes when I get home. I think Cocoa Kid was the one who really had to wear the cuffs though. His dive against Oakland Billy Smith was one of the most notorious of all times. It was ruled a NC I think. His domination - domination - of Holman Williams sometimes makes me wonder how good he really was and if Sugar Ray ducking of him - might be a strong word that - wasn't with very good reason. I wonder how good Kid really was?
Yes. I also really like Dick Tigers style on film. He might have been the only middleweight of all time too actually match or surpass Jake Lamotta in strength category. Tiger beat Nino Benvenuti Jose Torres 2x Joey Giardello 2x Gene Fullmer 2x Holly Mims Rubin Hurricane Carter Henry Hank Florentino Fernandez Yolande Pompey Roger Rouse Spider Webb * Most also believe he deserved the nod in his 66 battle with emile griffith. this would give him one of the best resumes of that era. INCREDIBLE RESUME. Holman Williams beat Lloyd Marshall 2x Charley Burley 3x Cocoa Kid 2x Eddie Booker Archie Moore Jack Chase 4x Bert Lytell 2x Bob Satterfield Aaron Tiger Wade Henry Hall Izzy Jannazzo Tommy Paul Unbelievable Resume. WOW. I would say Holman has the clear better resume at 160lb while tiger has him edged big time at 175lb, so it all evens out.
Yeah, you're a sucker for a box-puncher! Me too. I think Tiger edges it. I reckon they would be #1 and #2 though. Yeah, they could be the boys at the weight in terms of who they beat.
I strongly agree. He beat Holman Williams close to 10 times despite being a weltweright. this is higly impressive. A fight between him and robinson at 147lb should have been made. I would have loved to seen this. It would have told us alot. I do think Archie Moores knockout of Cocoa Kid is very impressive, just another demonstration of how deadly a finisher Archie was.
I think that you've misunderstood me - i'm saying Cocoa Kid may be even better than we think. Rating him is an utter nightmare. Did you hear the story of Robinson refusing to match Cocoa Kid at a charity event? I think Robinson was probably quite right not to fight that night, but he probably should have gone back and tidied that mess up.
Mcgrain screw the top 10!!! I cant leave out williams. From now on I have a top ELEVEN LIST ONLY!!! LOL 1. Carlos Monzon 2. Marvin Hagler 3. Harry Greb 4. Sugar Ray Robinson 5. Bernard Hopkins 6. Stanley Ketchel 7. Charley Burley 8. Lloyd Marshall 9. Jake Lamotta 10. Dick Tiger 11. Holman Williams
No, I understand you. Cocoa Kid may have been the best of the best if allowed to try his best. we dont know. Its a shame Eddie Futch made Burley and Williams famous with his praise of them, yet he had nothing to say of Cocoa Kid? Something has been kept from us all these years. He may have been the best of the best.
:good No. I don't have him with the absolute elite head to head at the weight, frankly. I don't know exactly how many it was, but he did something like 20 fights at 160. Two thirds of these, he was grossly undermatched. You learn as you fight at the highest level, obviously. Match him with the Carlos Monzon that destroyed Griffith the first time? What was he ****ing 75-3 or something? Undisputed champion, sixth defence, I don't know exactly, but that's a man that has mastered his craft...take the 168 Roy and shrink him down and he gives any MW trouble, but take the 24-0 version (15 or so bums - and i hardly ever use that word) and he'd get dragged into the oceon and drowned at the highest level - in my honest opinion. I'm a big Roy fan. The Roy Jones express, 20 plus pages, was a thread that was started by me in general ahead of his bieng matched by Joe C, but he's not all that at 160, i'm satisfied by that. The Hopkins win IS impressive, but it was years before Hopkins became primed - he was a Moore type, a type that became an absolute master of his craft with experience. EDIT: His slow start wasn't his fault. His father was jealous of him and under-matched him consistantly. With a different manager he would have done differently I think. Shame Roy got taught matchmaking by Roy senior. He could have done great things.
In a way, Cocoa made his own luck. If you have a reputation for diving the old school toughs won't respect you anything like as much as men like Burley who fought straight despite trouble. But he was grossly disadvantaged from the start, perhaps. He arrived in the US (i think) with Kid Chocolate and stayed there and changed his name when Chocolate was deported. So he went from being watched 24/7 to being out on his own. People took advatage. At 147 he may be the ultimate deluxe counter-puncher but we'll never know now. Burley beat him probably straight, but it sounds like he out-sped the Kid.
Well he beat Tony Zale who had just regained his title. I dont believe Zale was past his prime, he had just regained the title. Georgie Abrahams lost to Marcel too, and this is the same man that gae Srr hell. Plus Holman Williams, an old and past his prime but nonetheless still v good Williams. Just the year before he lost to Cerdan, Williams had gone 1-1 with Archie Moore, so its not like he was totally done. I know u criticise him for the LaMotta match, and fair enough, Lamotta was dominting early. But comebacks are possible, i dont think its completely reasonable to say that Cerdan would have had no shot at coming back strongly in the first fight had he not gotten injured. And he may have had a different strategy for the rematch, who knows. as far as the murders row are concerned, did ray robinson fight them?
good list my list is 1. Hagler 2. Monzon 3. Robinson 4. Greb 5. Walker 6. Hopkins 7. Tiger 8. Lamotta 9. Williams 10. Burley Ketchell just misses same with NP Dempsey also Tiger Flowers just out side Zale just misses aswell Good list as well MW iis so hard lol