Top 10 H2H fighters before 1900

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Melankomas, Mar 18, 2026.


  1. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,270
    10,024
    Dec 18, 2022
    From the start of Queensbury boxing in 1867 until 1899, who are your top 10 H2H fighters?
     
    Sangria likes this.
  2. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,270
    10,024
    Dec 18, 2022
  3. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,064
    6,104
    Jan 6, 2024
    I'm going in chronlogical order as I do with all my lists

    Peter Jackson
    Slavin
    Killen
    Joe McAuliffe
    Fitzsimmons
    Corbett
    Goddard
    Tom Sharkey
    Armstrong
    Jeffries

    Given the open nature of boxing in this era the divisions were more soccer style tiers of HW then they were modern weight classes.

    I was thinking of leaving Corbett out but I think he did enough to be picked to beat everyone not listed here. Peter Maher is next man up.
     
    mattdonnellon likes this.
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,988
    27,986
    Feb 15, 2006
    I would say that Peter Maher belongs more than a few people on that list.
     
  5. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,270
    10,024
    Dec 18, 2022
    My list would, very roughly, be:

    Sullivan
    Jeffries
    Fitz
    Jackson
    Corbett
    Goddard
    Sharkey
    Slavin
    Maher
    Mitchell
     
    Seamus and mattdonnellon like this.
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,988
    27,986
    Feb 15, 2006
    Let us prepare the ground here.

    You basically have three definable eras there.

    1. The transitional era, where former bareknuckle fighters were transitioning to Queensbury rules, and a few had considerable success, i.e. Mace, Ryan, Elliot.

    Jawn L comes in like a battering ram at this point.

    2. The mixed era, when the world is debating which rule set is better, and Sullivan has to compete under both for his manifest sins, i.e. Mitchell, Greenfield Burke, Killrain.

    3. The post bare knuckle era, where the bare knuckle rules are buried, and a new generation of Queensbury fighters are emerging, i.e. Slavin, Jackson Corbett..
     
    mattdonnellon likes this.
  7. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,777
    2,118
    Dec 2, 2006
    Almost my list!
    I'd swap Kilrain, Ruhlin or Choynski in for Mitchell, but either of these four is fine by me.
     
    Melankomas likes this.
  8. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,270
    10,024
    Dec 18, 2022
    I could see a case for the Ruhlin of the Sharkey rematch being ahead of Mitchell, but it seems like Mitchell was more 'game' to win, quick, tough and had better endurance than them. That Sullivan rematch may have been as much of a track-race as it was a fight but Charlie went through hell and still appeared fresh after three hours and terrible, cold rain.

    I know, I know; it wasn't a gloved fight, and Mitchell's gloved resume isn't exactly spectacular, but I don't think we can just discount his toughness and endurance against the best puncher of the era, alongside his abnormal speed even for his size and apparent well roundedness. Not to mention Mitchell can hit; KO'd Cleary who outweighed him by 30 pounds, apparently KO'd Slade in a private match who surely outweighed him by like 50 pounds, and it seems like he also got the better of Kilrain in their 1884 fight given how he knocked Jake down despite dropping 16 pounds to him.
     
    mattdonnellon likes this.