Top 10 head to head under 190lb all time?

Rocky
Jones
Tunney
Holyfield
Dempsey
Charles
Conn
Patterson
Moore
Foster

Not seen enough of langford, greb or fitz to list them.

 

It is a good list apart from the fact that Roy Jones is on it.

He simply dosn't belong in the same company as the other people on the list.

I also don't see how Sam Langford can be ranked any lower than #3.

 

Such a ridiculous comment about Jones.

I've not seen enough of langford to rate him as a h2h force below 190.

 

Jim Corbett shouldnt be forgotten.

 

What is the minimum, because I'm gonna start throwing Duran, Robinson and Armstrong in there.

 

I know I am Missing a few here but



1. Rocky Marciano- 1951

This content is protected

2. Jack Dempsey- 1919

This content is protected

3. Ezzard Charles- 1948

This content is protected

4. Sam Langford- 1910

This content is protected

5. Gene Tunney- 1924

This content is protected

6. Archie Moore 1952

This content is protected

7. Billy Conn 1941

This content is protected

[/quote]

eight) Michael Spinks

9) Floyd Patterson

10) Harold Johnson -Greb

 

Suzie Q,,


That is some impressive list,,,,,,,can't imagine anyone in that 'round robin'
tournament coming out undefeated.

 

1. Marciano - 1951
2. Johnson - 1904
3. Dempsey - 1919
4. Holyfield - 1988
5. Tunney - 1924
6. Langford - 1910
7. Patterson - 1956
8. Charles - 1948
9. Jones Jr - 2000
10. Spinks - 1982

 

To a degree it depends on same day weigh ins or 24 hour weigh ins, but mine is:

1. RJJ
2. Holyfield
3. Marciano
4. Patterson
5. Charles
6. Haye
7.Tunney
8. Moore
9.Dempsey
10. Spinks

Johnson @ 185lb doesn't have footage, Langford doesn't have significant footage either, both may make the list but without footage I won't judge. The same applies for Harry Greb

Probably because you didn't/don't follow or watch boxing at the time, now or ever

 

There are a lot of posts of yours that I don't agree with PP, however I like the way you keep your views so consistently in evey thread and don't make exceptions for fighters you may favour. Having already seen Johnson film and the fact that most if not all sources suggest Langford was easy work for Johnson. I know this wasn't the best version of langford, but to do it in such emphatic fashion suggests he was more than a force to be reckoned with under 190 and I can't see anyone matching him for strength under 190 lbs.

Greb on the other hand is a mystery to almost everyone. We've seen how good Tunney looked on film as a boxer, but the fact he was able to get the better of him, justifies many to think highly of Greb, but considering we have seen no footage of Greb fighting, I feel he gets slightly overrated on this forum.

Oh and btw, pretty good list :good