Top 10 heavies: Social impact

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by JAB5239, Jan 27, 2011.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007

    Sounds an awful lot like "he was a famous boxer" to me.

    Try comparing people going to watch boxing in numbers to the actual impact of Johnson or Ali.
     
  2. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,139
    13,095
    Jan 4, 2008
    Sinatra would probably be a better comparison. He was probably almost as popular as Elvis, but Elvis brought with him a new way for a generation to view themselves. He more or less heralded the start of a mass youth culture. Dempsey had no such social impact.
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Define "social impact" or "actual impact" then.

    Dempsey had a massive impact in society. Social impact. Not just being famous. I think I've outlined that he represents a leap in sporting stardom and the commercial side of sport (absolutely measurably in actual monetary terms), and broadened out the audience of boxing (a newly legalized sport, no less) tremendously, and spectator sports in general.

    Ali's actual impact is actually on similar terms to Dempsey's, but he did in internationally, and on colour TV.
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Obviously he didn't have the same social impact as Elvis. If he had, then Elvis wouldn't have had an impact at all. :lol:

    But he stands, along with Babe Ruth, as a new level of sporting star/hero.
    And, far more so than Babe Ruth, he represented a rise in the commercial potential of sports - as a unparrallelled box-office attraction and earner.
    Professional sports in now a multi-billion dollar sector - this isn't superficial impact I'm talking about. This is economics and culture. Dempsey was a key player.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Impact of the sportsman on wider society.

    Reading something like Boxing: A Cultural History or Bad ******: National Impact of Jack Johnson.

    The first one would be the most interesting because Dempsey is included and the vast difference between him and those that made a genuine wider impact is massive.

    The second one, not so much, but it does underline how near-impossible it would be to construct such a book about Dempsey.
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,139
    13,095
    Jan 4, 2008
    That's why I think Sinatra is a better comparison. You could say all the same things about him as a singer/showman.

    Elvis had an impact beyond this kind of popularity - as had Johnson, Louis and Ali.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    I agree that Ali belongs in the same bracket as those two.


    Watch this ****-storm now.
     
  8. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    I've read the book, Kasia Boddy, a good read. Not read the Johnson one.

    I don't see how Dempsey's impact wasn't present in "wider society".
    I don't see how boosting sports as a massive commercial enterprise and as integral aspect of modern western cultural is NOT having a wide impact.

    Johnson's impact is related to issues of injustice, liberation, race politics, equality, prejudice.

    Dempsey's relates to mainstream culture, leisure, commerce, capitalism, consumerism, enterprise and entertainment economics.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Of course it was. Who says it wasn't? I made a post indicating I thought he was ranked to high in this regard. You made a post which appeared to take a contrary opinion. This is a question of degrees - I don't think Dempsey belongs anywhere near the top of this list. And, in all honesty, what you've said has just reinforced that, the basic argument being "famous boxer".



    OK. What specific impacts did Dempsey have on consumerism in wider society?
     
  10. groove

    groove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,056
    26
    May 16, 2006
    isn't ali the most photographed person ever? he cut through to everyone not only boxing.
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005

    For example, the concept of radio entertainment was demonstrated by the broadcast of the Dempsey-Carpentier fight.
    Thousands of people convened in the streets to to listen to radio hook-ups of the fight.
    RCA began manufacturing home radio sets on the strength of this, and had sold $83 million worth within 3 years.
    Radio became the medium of entertainment and advertising for the next 30+ years.
    Dempsey played his part.
     
  12. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Times Square on the day of a Dempsey fight. Crowds awaiting news.

    This content is protected
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    Sure, but according to what i've just read probably no more than something like Alabama-Stanford, the first national NBC broadcast. Either way, the point is all sports were involved with this medium which actually owes more to presidential election results than anything else for its early histories success as far as I can see.



    I think he really did play his part.

    Let's compare Dempsey being a part of radio's inevitable rise to commentary on Johnson's wider impact.

    For somone like Booker T, Jack Johnson caused "general racial redemption". For others, like Reinford, he appears to have been a terrorist in a climate where terrorism was all but impossible - the armed wing of a social revolution which would be one-hundred years in the making, and some fifty years before actual physical resistance became possible.

    He was literally a totem for both sides in the most fundamental conflict in American since the Civil War.

    I don't think being on the radio really compares.
     
  14. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,139
    13,095
    Jan 4, 2008
    Tigers are ****ing badass. It just have to be said.
     
  15. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    You quote two people's views on Jack Johnson - one of whom (Reinford), admittedly I've never even heard of - who make some claims about Johnson. Soundbites of literary intellectuals need to be backed up by something more substantial. "Commentary" on Johnson's impact doesn't pass for actual social impact that you've been promising.
    I might as well quote one of the Dempsey-phile literary writers waxing poetic on him being the embodiment of the American Dream or the symbol of the roaring twenties where the wild west meets modern industrial society etc, etc. That's akin to what you've provided with Johnson.

    You reduce my example down to Dempsey "being on the radio".
    You, quite fairly, describe Radio's rise as "inevitable". But the same can be said of any social progress that you might care to link Johnson's career to too.

    For the record, I believe Johnson and Dempsey both had massive social impact.