No particular order: Mike Tyson Evander Holyfield Lennox Lewis Wlad Klitschko Vitali Klitschko Tyson Fury Anthony Joshua Deontay Wilder George Foreman Riddick Bowe
Mercer wasn't lineal, though. Yeah, I'll swap Rahman out for Sanders. However, Mercer may have been better than both, but he didn't achieve as much. Too patchy in his prime, and didn't get the Lewis win like he could've.
Lewis Holyfield Wlad/Tyson Fury Bowe Joshua Vitali Byrd Wilder Foreman Just missed out : Moorer, Povetkin, Douglas, Ruiz, Foreman, Rahman, Sanders, Haye, Ruiz jr., Mercer
Mercer was a tough WBO Champ back then. I suppose his win column is lesser than impressive, so I'll gladly concede to you omission Good ol WBO ranking system back then.
In order of year Larry Holmes Mike Tyson Lennox Lewis Evander Holyfield Riddick Bowe Tommy Morrison Vitali Klitschko Wlad Klitschko Anthony Joshua Tyson Fury
the IMO easy 5 picks are: Lewis, Tyson, Wlad, Vitali, Fury. next I'll pick Bowe [though honestly I'm giving him more credit for a single performance - Holyfield I - than I did for a lot of other guys like say Andy Ruiz or Mercer, even Buster Douglas, who rose to a big occasion once or twice] then Holyfield - never looked impregnable & was no doubt by far the worst drugs cheat on my list but, still, an exceptional competitor. the last three... are much harder to pick. i'll go with Anthony Joshua and, partly just to pick a couple of different names Tim Witherspoon [though in fairness by 1986 there were only a few drops of his best form left - i almost went with 90s Foreman, only partly for sentimental reasons], and Tony Tucker, who I really rated.
1. Dustin Nichols (Wilder fight) 2. Tyson Fury 3. Wlad Klitschko 4. Dustin Nichols (Suggi Foxx fight) 5. Mike Tyson 6. Audley Harrison 7. Holyfield 8. Old Dustin Nichols (Brewer fight) 9. Dustin Nichols (Diabetes fight) 10. Dustin Nichols (Heart disease fight)
1. Wlad 2. Lewis 3. Holyfield 4. Tyson 5. Vitali 6. Fury 7. Joshua 8. Bowe 9. Povetkin 10. Byrd 11. Chagaev 12. Brewster 13. Peter 14. Ruiz 15. Rahman
1. Lewis 2. Hollyfield 3. Tyson 4. Wlad 5. AJ 6. Fury 7. Bowe 8 vitali 9. Ike Ibeabuchi 10. This is were it gets hard to call and close between the likes of Golota, Mercer, Tua and Povetkin for the final spot.
George Foreman and Deontay Wilder aren't getting much love in this thread. Wilder was WBC champ for five years and has one loss. George Foreman, the oldest man to regain the title, is probably the most famous living heavyweight champion. Ruslan Chagaev? Chris Byrd? Henry Akinwande? Herbie Hide? Ray Mercer? LOL. Did you guys actually follow boxing from 1986 to 2020? Byrd's two big wins came over guys who tore their rotator cuffs. Vitali tore his and quit. Holyfield tore his in the FIRST round, didn't quit, and just fought one handed for 11 rounds. Otherwise, Byrd was barely eaking out decisions all over the place. It's like someone praising Charles Martin for the Czar Glazkov "win." Only Byrd won BOTH his belts on injuries.
I can't understand the logic in having Wilder ahead of Mercer. Mercer best win (Morrison) is far more impressive than than Wilder's best win ( Ortiz). Even beating a 38 year old Witherspoon (Mercer was 35 at the time) is more impressive than beating Ortiz. Also Mercer gave Lewis a good, tough close fight.
You can't understand the logic of having a WBC heavyweight champion with 10 succcessful title defenses and a five year reign over a guy who held a WBO belt for a handful of months, tried to bribe a journeyman to throw a fight because he was losing, needed a gift draw to get past Marion Wilson? Michael Bentt knocked out Tommy Morrison, too. And faster. Who cares? And beating Tim Witherspoon is better than beating Ortiz? Hell, people at the time were outraged Mercer got the decision over Witherspoon. Do you remember that? How is a controversial decision over Witherspoon better than knocking down the #4 contender three times and stopping him twice? This ridiculous bias against Wilder is just stupid. Seriously.