This is my top 10 after pure potential (whether fulfilled or not) ability in terms of skill, physical and mental attributes etc. 1. Ali 2. Walcott 3. Holmes 4. Louis 5. Liston 6. Johnson 7. Wills 8. Lewis 9. Marciano 10. Frazier Now some of you will "wtf, no Tyson?! If he had fulfilled his potential he'd be perhaps the greatest ever." Thing is, I think he fulfilled his potential more or less. He was given all the possibilities. That he veered off course, fired Rooney etc was because of flawed personality, not that he was denied fulfilling his potential. Walcott, on the other hand, was denied fulfilling his potential, since he wasn't given the necissary breaks until 30 after a 4 year lay-off.
Yeah. This is no definite list, more something I did on the cuff. Holyfield and Tyson both have good calls for places in the lower top 10, but it is crowded in there.
The way the fights against Clay/Ali ended are always going to raise question marks concerning his mental toughness, though. Louis, Ali and Holmes would never quit like that and they score very highly in most other departments as well.
As a package Liston didn't really have any weakneses either technicaly or in terms of ring generalship. The only thing you could bring up was that his hand speed was not among the best. I also think that he had heart when he was hungry and the title was outside his grasp.
All true. But the way he surrendered the title is always going to hurt him when we're getting this high up, where the competition is so fierce. Losing to those versions of Ali/Clay is not the least shameful when you're aging yourself, and if he had gone out on his shield in both fights he would look good for top 3 in this list.
I wouldn't put Marciano in there in terms of talent his success was more down to other things like determination, will power and an insane training regimes. I think Patterson should make the list.
Yes, and these are definitely mental attributes. As I define it that's part of a fighter's overall ability. Ability = skill + physical and mental attributes.
I get what you are saying, but when most people think of "talent" they think of physical talent. While in a way it's true that willpower and determination could be viewed as a "mental talent", I think there is something to be said for the fact that we as humans have the ability to make a choice for those kinds of things, and it's not necessarily something we have no control over.
Well, I don't get so philosophical, I just see to the whole package. No matter how much physical talent you have, you're not getting to an elite level without determination and a strong will. As I define it in this thread, all these attributes combined adds up to a fighters ability/talent/potential. If their achievements doesn't match this potential it's because matters outside their control. That's why Wills and Walcott are much higher on this list than they would be on a regular one.
Talent is something you are born with--you either have it or you don't. It is out of your control. That is pretty much the definition of talent. My point is I think it starts to get kind of tricky when you start calling things like determination and willpower a "mental talent". I think people can have personal ups and downs, and it isn't always a reflection of mental instability or something out of their control. I'll use myself as an example. I won't go into details, but long story short, I had a lengthy down period of my life. And then, literally, one morning I woke up, decided I was sick of it, and made some serious changes. I improved my life in many ways--I started to work much harder, maximized my talents, and I have never looked back. I am now known as a person with steadfast willpower amongst my friends and family. And I attribute it to personal decisions I made. Is this capability a "talent" I was born with? Perhaps it can be debated.....but I do know that my life wasn't always like this until I made the cognizant decision to change myself.
I never mention it, but I've always thought Riddick Bowe could have been a tremendous fighter - with the right attitude. As it turns out, he was very good anyway, but falls into the 15-20 category, or even lower. I can imagine Bowe, at his best, beating Tyson and Lewis. At the same time.
Marciano had more than mental power. He had a iron chin, and punching power, plus a under rated defense. And powerful legs.